Re: Are gzip-compressed substitutes still used?

Vagrant Cascadian skribis: > On 2021-03-17, Léo Le Bouter wrote: >> Just as a reminder siding with vagrantc here: >> >> We must ensure the Debian 'guix' package can still work and upgrade >> from it's installed version, so ensure that removing gzip doesnt break >> initial 'guix pull' with it. >

Re: Are gzip-compressed substitutes still used?

On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 09:00:20AM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > Except for issues like the openssl bug which causes build failure due to > certificate expiry in the test suite basically would break guix pull in > those cases... maybe that is a deal breaker for the Debian packaged > guix...

Re: Are gzip-compressed substitutes still used?

On 2021-03-18, zimoun wrote: > On Wed, 17 Mar 2021 at 11:08, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > >> ... and I would expect this version to ship in Debian for another ~3-5 >> years, unless it gets removed from Debian bullseye before the upcoming >> (real soon now) release! > > I could miss a point. In 3-5

Re: Are gzip-compressed substitutes still used?

Hi Vagrant, On Wed, 17 Mar 2021 at 11:08, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > ... and I would expect this version to ship in Debian for another ~3-5 > years, unless it gets removed from Debian bullseye before the upcoming > (real soon now) release! I could miss a point. In 3-5 years, some people will

Re: Are gzip-compressed substitutes still used?

On 17.03.21 18:12, Ludovic Courtès wrote: (See for the initial message.) Here’s an update, 1.5 month later. This time I’m looking at nginx logs covering Feb 8th to Mar 17th and using a laxer regexp than in the message above,

Re: Are gzip-compressed substitutes still used?

Hi, On Wed, 17 Mar 2021 at 18:12, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > I’d still like to start providing zstd-compressed substitutes though. > So I think what we can do is: > > • start providing zstd substitutes on berlin right now so that when > 1.2.1 comes out, at least some substitutes are

Re: Are gzip-compressed substitutes still used?

On 2021-03-17, Léo Le Bouter wrote: > Just as a reminder siding with vagrantc here: > > We must ensure the Debian 'guix' package can still work and upgrade > from it's installed version, so ensure that removing gzip doesnt break > initial 'guix pull' with it. ... and I would expect this version

Re: Are gzip-compressed substitutes still used?

Just as a reminder siding with vagrantc here: We must ensure the Debian 'guix' package can still work and upgrade from it's installed version, so ensure that removing gzip doesnt break initial 'guix pull' with it. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Are gzip-compressed substitutes still used?

Hi, Ludovic Courtès skribis: > From that, we could deduce that about 1% of our users who take > substitutes from ci.guix are still using a pre-1.1.0 daemon without > support for lzip compression. > > I find it surprisingly low: 1.1.0 was released “only” 9 months ago, > which is not a lot for

Are gzip-compressed substitutes still used?

Hi Nicolò, Nicolò Balzarotti skribis: > Ludovic Courtès writes: > >> We could also drop gzip, but there are probably pre-1.1 daemons out >> there that understand nothing but gzip¹, so perhaps that’ll have to >> wait. Now, compressing substitutes three times may be somewhat >> unreasonable. >>