Hi Danny,
Danny Milosavljevic writes:
>> Note that we also lost 'icecat' on armhf-linux with the 52->60 upgrade,
>> because our 'rust' packages have never worked on armhf-linux.
>
> Wait, what? I wasn't aware. Let's track this as a bug - that's
> definitely not supposed to happen.
>
> mrustc
On 2018-12-12 08:40, Andreas Enge wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 03:16:56AM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
I'm opposed to dropping i686 support. If we dropped support for systems
that are not well supported in Guix, the only system left standing would
be x86_64-linux. I believe it is of
Hi Joshua,
Joshua Branson writes:
> The last time I tried guix's iceweasel, it was *un-useable* on many
> sites I came across. I couldn't log into my bank account (though that's
> probably 'cause my bank only lets you log in via "firefox"), youtube
> stopped working, scrolling was choppy,
swedebu...@riseup.net writes:
> First of all thanks for building a great OS!
+1
> In my view we still have a system where encountering a bug is still far
> more common than any other OS I ever used.
+1
> To sum it up: lets not ruin what we have by rushing ahead and ending
> beta too early.
+1
swedebu...@riseup.net writes:
> Hi
>
>
> E.g. on 0.16.0-3.6ddc63e (a few days behind master) on an i686-install
> on a x86 64 bit machine with a slow disk and 2GB RAM
> 1) right now webkit freezes on youtube
While, a FSF endorsed distro has no requirement to support a non-free
website, as a
Hi Danny,
Danny Milosavljevic writes:
>> Note that we also lost 'icecat' on armhf-linux with the 52->60 upgrade,
>> because our 'rust' packages have never worked on armhf-linux.
>
> Wait, what? I wasn't aware. Let's track this as a bug - that's
> definitely not supposed to happen.
>
> mrustc
Ricardo Wurmus transcribed 659 bytes:
>
> n...@n0.is writes:
>
> > Let's not drop an architecture because occasionally something breaks for
> > it. breakage is bad, yes. but it's more than just the broken packages.
> > it is the way patches find their way into master. if you have more
> >
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 03:16:56AM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> > I'm opposed to dropping i686 support. If we dropped support for systems
> > that are not well supported in Guix, the only system left standing would
> > be x86_64-linux. I believe it is of paramount importance that Guix be
> >
Mark H Weaver writes:
>> Lets either drop i686 support or test it more and look into the missing
>> substitutes.
>
> I'm opposed to dropping i686 support. If we dropped support for systems
> that are not well supported in Guix, the only system left standing would
> be x86_64-linux. I believe
n...@n0.is writes:
> Let's not drop an architecture because occasionally something breaks for
> it. breakage is bad, yes. but it's more than just the broken packages.
> it is the way patches find their way into master. if you have more
> patience then I had, you can try to address the workflow
Danny Milosavljevic writes:
> Hi Mark,
>
>> Note that we also lost 'icecat' on armhf-linux with the 52->60 upgrade,
>> because our 'rust' packages have never worked on armhf-linux.
>
> Wait, what? I wasn't aware. Let's track this as a bug - that's
> definitely not supposed to happen.
>
>
Hi Mark,
> Note that we also lost 'icecat' on armhf-linux with the 52->60 upgrade,
> because our 'rust' packages have never worked on armhf-linux.
Wait, what? I wasn't aware. Let's track this as a bug - that's
definitely not supposed to happen.
mrustc works on armhf - I tested it on physical
Hi,
In this message, I'll respond to only one of your points:
swedebu...@riseup.net writes:
> 3) icecat does not have a substitute available and guix package -i
> icecat -n outputs:
> The following derivations would be built:
>/gnu/store/7wmg5qw3s45mi8ss9q3q45hfmx3j91y6-profile.drv
>
swedebu...@riseup.net transcribed 4.7K bytes:
> Hi
>
> First of all thanks for building a great OS! (im writing this in vimb in
> guixsd) :D
>
> Below is my reaction to the talk about 1.0 that has appeared on the
> list.
>
> I see Ludo' is entuthiastic about 1.0 and hope to reach that soon.
>
Hi
First of all thanks for building a great OS! (im writing this in vimb in
guixsd) :D
Below is my reaction to the talk about 1.0 that has appeared on the
list.
I see Ludo' is entuthiastic about 1.0 and hope to reach that soon.
I recently decided to try running guix as a daily system to test
15 matches
Mail list logo
