Hi Timothy,
On sam., 27 janv. 2024 at 10:59, Timothy Sample wrote:
> https://git.ngyro.com/git-annex-remote-clouda/tree/git-annex-remote-clouda/remote.scm
Oh cool, thanks. Bookmarked.
Cheers,
simon
and to make
> it easier to create backups (right now those videos are stored on our
> two main servers and rsynced between them⁰; I’m talking about the videos
> at guix.gnu.org, 10years.guix.gnu.org, and hpc.guix.info).
>
> The question boils down to: Git-LFS or Git Annex?
>
>
On 2024-01-28 18:32, Giovanni Biscuolo wrote:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> Nicolas Graves writes:
>
> [...]
>
>> This is not always true. Git-LFS also has the concept of Custom Transfer
>> Agents, which in some cases do not need a running server. One example is
>> lfs-folderstore, which can simply use a
e stored on our
> two main servers and rsynced between them⁰; I’m talking about the videos
> at guix.gnu.org, 10years.guix.gnu.org, and hpc.guix.info).
>
> The question boils down to: Git-LFS or Git Annex?
>
> From a quick look (I haven’t used them), Git-LFS seems to assume a
Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas Graves writes:
[...]
> This is not always true. Git-LFS also has the concept of Custom Transfer
> Agents, which in some cases do not need a running server. One example is
> lfs-folderstore, which can simply use a remote directory as a LFS
> remote.
thanks, i didn't know
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 28, 2024, at 5:33 AM, Nicolas Graves via Development of GNU Guix
and the GNU System distribution. wrote:
> I've left git-annex for git-lfs, I'll just add a few points about
> git-lfs.
>
>
> On 2024-01-24 18:39, Giovanni Biscuolo wrote:
>
>> Hi Ludo’
>&
I've left git-annex for git-lfs, I'll just add a few points about
git-lfs.
On 2024-01-24 18:39, Giovanni Biscuolo wrote:
> Hi Ludo’
>
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
> [...]
>
>> The question boils down to: Git-LFS or Git Annex?
>>
>> From a quick look
Timothy Sample writes:
> I’ve written a special remote in Guile. If anyone wants to do so, the
> following file might help. It implements the basic protocol.
>
> https://git.ngyro.com/git-annex-remote-clouda/tree/git-annex-remote-clouda/remote.scm
Looks like a great reference. Thanks for
Simon Tournier writes:
>> Special remotes can also be written in other languages:
>>
>> https://git-annex.branchable.com/design/external_special_remote_protocol/
>
> Thanks! I did not know. Indeed, it could be a nice GSoC to implement
> some ‘git-annex-backend-nar’. :-)
I’ve written a
Hi,
On 1/24/24 10:22, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
The question boils down to: Git-LFS or Git Annex?
[...]
What’s your experience? What would you suggest?
I have a few times had a problem for which I thought Git LFS might be a
solution, and each time I have ended up ripping out Git LFS
Hi Kyle,
On jeu., 25 janv. 2024 at 21:20, Kyle Meyer wrote:
> Fwiw I think someone could do that outside Haskell, if they preferred,
> via a custom backend:
>
> https://git-annex.branchable.com/design/external_backend_protocol/
>
> Special remotes can also be written in other languages:
>
>
Simon Tournier writes:
> As we see, since ’origin’ is unreachable, it fetches directly from the
> web. Well, on machine-B running:
>
> git annex sync && git annex get -A
>
> allows to first update the keys and then to fetch all the new content
> from ’origin’. It eases the maintenance of
Hi Ludo, all,
On mer., 24 janv. 2024 at 16:22, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> The question boils down to: Git-LFS or Git Annex?
Some months ago, I gave a look for managing some datasets. My
conclusion is Git-Annex. The main drawback of Git-LFS is that the
server needs to support the proto
Hi pukkamustard,
git-annex is complex but no so complicated when you learn the two
foundamental concepts (sorry if I say something obvious to you!):
1. only the names of the files and some other metadata are stored in a
git repository when using git-annex, the content is not; when you "git
annex
Hi all,
On 2024-01-24 19:41, pukkamustard wrote:
> I've used Git Annex for managing many large files (~100s of GiBs) and it
> worked. However, I found Git Annex to be quite complex and to do things
> automatically without me fully realizing.
>
I can mirror this sentiment. As far as my
Hi!
Ludovic Courtès writes:
[..]
> From a quick look (I haven’t used them), Git-LFS seems to assume a
> rather centralized model where there’s an LFS server sitting next to the
> Git server¹. Git Annex looks more decentralized, allowing you to have
> several “remotes”, to check the status
Hi Ludo’
Ludovic Courtès writes:
[...]
> The question boils down to: Git-LFS or Git Annex?
>
> From a quick look (I haven’t used them), Git-LFS seems to assume a
> rather centralized model where there’s an LFS server sitting next to the
> Git server¹. Git Annex looks mor
and rsynced between them⁰; I’m talking about the
videos
at guix.gnu.org, 10years.guix.gnu.org, and hpc.guix.info).
The question boils down to: Git-LFS or Git Annex?
From a quick look (I haven’t used them), Git-LFS seems to assume a
rather centralized model where there’s an LFS server sitting next
at guix.gnu.org, 10years.guix.gnu.org, and hpc.guix.info).
The question boils down to: Git-LFS or Git Annex?
>From a quick look (I haven’t used them), Git-LFS seems to assume a
rather centralized model where there’s an LFS server sitting next to the
Git server¹. Git Annex looks more decentrali
19 matches
Mail list logo
