Cyril Roelandt skribis:
> On 08/27/2015 12:53 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Here’s a long overdue ‘guix graph’ command (documentation below.)
>> Comments welcome!
>
> Would it be hard to do the opposite of what guix graph does ? I'd like
> to be able to find the list of packages which depend on a
I think that is what `guix gc --referrers /gnu/store/...package` does.
http://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/html_node/Invoking-guix-gc.html
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015, at 20:02, Cyril Roelandt wrote:
> On 08/27/2015 12:53 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > Here’s a long overdue ‘guix graph’ command (doc
On 08/27/2015 12:53 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Here’s a long overdue ‘guix graph’ command (documentation below.)
> Comments welcome!
Would it be hard to do the opposite of what guix graph does ? I'd like
to be able to find the list of packages which depend on a given package.
This would be usefu
On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 10:13:01AM +0200, Pjotr Prins wrote:
> Maybe we should have both.
Well, there is no real need for two versions; if most people like things
as they are, they should stay as they are.
Andreas
t; > From: guix-devel-bounces+mec=stowers@gnu.org [mailto:guix-devel-
> > bounces+mec=stowers@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Ludovic Courtès
> > Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2015 3:47 PM
> > To: Andreas Enge
> > Cc: Guix-devel
> > Subject: Re: New ‘guix graph’
-devel-
> bounces+mec=stowers@gnu.org] On Behalf Of Ludovic Courtès
> Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2015 3:47 PM
> To: Andreas Enge
> Cc: Guix-devel
> Subject: Re: New ‘guix graph’ command
>
> Hey!
>
> Andreas Enge skribis:
>
> > Very neat indeed!
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hey!
>
> Andreas Enge skribis:
>
>> Very neat indeed! A tiny bit of nitpicking: Would it not be preferable if
>> the arrows were reversed, from the inputs to the dependent packages?
>
> Dunno, maybe the graph people would choose the other d
Hey!
Andreas Enge skribis:
> Very neat indeed! A tiny bit of nitpicking: Would it not be preferable if
> the arrows were reversed, from the inputs to the dependent packages?
Dunno, maybe the graph people would choose the other direction but I
like it this way, looks more “intuitive” to me. Wha
Hello!
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 12:53:03AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Here’s a long overdue ‘guix graph’ command (documentation below.)
> Comments welcome!
Very neat indeed! A tiny bit of nitpicking: Would it not be preferable if
the arrows were reversed, from the inputs to the dependent pack
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> "Thompson, David" skribis:
>
>> Just one question: I see that when using the 'references' type, each
>> node in the graph has an arrow pointing to itself. Is that
>> intentional?
>
> It’s not really “each node” but rather “most nodes.” :
"Thompson, David" skribis:
> Just one question: I see that when using the 'references' type, each
> node in the graph has an arrow pointing to itself. Is that
> intentional?
It’s not really “each node” but rather “most nodes.” :-)
The daemon keeps track of all the references of each item, inc
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 6:53 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Here’s a long overdue ‘guix graph’ command (documentation below.)
> Comments welcome!
This is awesome! I think it will prove to be a really helpful tool
for understanding the relationships between packages and discovering
issues l
Ludovic Courtès (2015-08-27 01:53 +0300) wrote:
> Here’s a long overdue ‘guix graph’ command (documentation below.)
> Comments welcome!
This is really cool! Thank you!
--
Alex
Mathieu Lirzin skribis:
> Nice job, It is really convenient to have such utility.
>
> Does it sound feasible to produce different edge colors depending of the type
> of inputs?
Of course! But this is left as an exercise to the reader. :-)
Similarly, I thought we could use different color boxe
Nice job, It is really convenient to have such utility.
Does it sound feasible to produce different edge colors depending of the type
of inputs?
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> ‘bag-emerged’
> This is the package DAG, _including_ implicit inputs.
>
> For instance, the followin
Very useful!
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 12:53:03AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Here’s a long overdue ‘guix graph’ command (documentation below.)
> Comments welcome!
>
> Ludo’.
16 matches
Mail list logo
