Hi Roel,
Roel Janssen skribis:
> From cf5a01aba3c08b7c62048bff3e0f1df80dc0b4dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Roel Janssen
> Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 06:48:52 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] guix scripts: Disable grafting on dry runs.
>
> * guix/scripts/archive.scm, guix/scripts/build.scm,
> guix/sc
Roel Janssen writes:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> Roel Janssen skribis:
>>
>>> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>>>
Hi!
Alex Kost skribis:
> Roel Janssen (2016-07-23 18:11 +0300) wrote:
>
>> Dear Guix,
>>
>> For some time now, running `guix package --dry-run --u
>From cf5a01aba3c08b7c62048bff3e0f1df80dc0b4dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Roel Janssen
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 06:48:52 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] guix scripts: Disable grafting on dry runs.
* guix/scripts/archive.scm, guix/scripts/build.scm,
guix/scripts/environment.scm, guix/scripts/system.scm
Alex Kost skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès (2016-07-28 16:01 +0300) wrote:
[...]
>> --- a/guix/scripts.scm
>> +++ b/guix/scripts.scm
>> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>>#:use-module (guix utils)
>>#:use-module (guix ui)
>>#:use-module (guix store)
>> + #:use-module (guix grafts)
>>#:use-module (g
Ludovic Courtès (2016-07-28 16:01 +0300) wrote:
> Alex Kost skribis:
[...]
>> However, I tried it and it doesn't work for me (note: I know nothing
>> about monads, gexps, etc.). When I try this:
>>
>>(mbegin %store-monad
>> (set-grafting #f)
>> …)
>>
>> the grafting doesn't happen,
Alex Kost skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès (2016-07-28 01:19 +0300) wrote:
>
>> Alex Kost skribis:
[...]
>>> From d7747453bf31a616d414dce293fc0556d601abcb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Alex Kost
>>> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 14:55:50 +0300
>>> Subject: [PATCH] emacs: Disable grafts when dry-run i
Ludovic Courtès (2016-07-28 01:19 +0300) wrote:
> Alex Kost skribis:
>
>> I have zero knowledge in grafting, but if I checked it right, the
>> attached patch should disable grafting for the emacs interface (when
>> dry-run is on). If you think it should be a part of a bigger
>> dry-run+no-grafts
Alex Kost skribis:
> I have zero knowledge in grafting, but if I checked it right, the
> attached patch should disable grafting for the emacs interface (when
> dry-run is on). If you think it should be a part of a bigger
> dry-run+no-grafts patch, please use it.
Two separate patches is fine, IM
Ludovic Courtès (2016-07-26 15:41 +0300) wrote:
> Roel Janssen skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès writes:
[...]
>>> Something similar should be done in the Emacs interface.
>>
>> I'm not familiar with the code of the Emacs interface. Any other
>> takers for it? Otherwise I will look into it, but tha
Alex Kost skribis:
> The only way I see for the Emacs interface is to modify
> "emacs/guix-main.scm" to parameterize ‘%graft?’ as well and to set it
> depending on the current value of ‘dry-run’. AFAICT this
> parameterization should be added to:
>
> - 'process-package-actions': it is responsibl
Ludovic Courtès (2016-07-26 12:50 +0300) wrote:
> Roel Janssen skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès writes:
[...]
>>> But honestly, I think changing ‘--dry-run’ to do ‘--dry-run --no-grafts’
>>> would be fine, and probably better than the current situation.
>>
>> Could you provide some insight in where
Roel Janssen skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> Roel Janssen skribis:
>>
>>> Ludovic Courtès writes:
[...]
>> Everything that relates to command-line argument processing is in (guix
>> scripts build), for the common options, and then in each (guix scripts
>> *) module.
>>
>> Roughly, the
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Roel Janssen skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> Alex Kost skribis:
>>>
Roel Janssen (2016-07-23 18:11 +0300) wrote:
> Dear Guix,
>
> For some time now, running `guix package --dry-run --upgrade' results in
> build actions
Roel Janssen skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Alex Kost skribis:
>>
>>> Roel Janssen (2016-07-23 18:11 +0300) wrote:
>>>
Dear Guix,
For some time now, running `guix package --dry-run --upgrade' results in
build actions involving grafting. For a dry-run, I fi
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hi!
>
> Alex Kost skribis:
>
>> Roel Janssen (2016-07-23 18:11 +0300) wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Guix,
>>>
>>> For some time now, running `guix package --dry-run --upgrade' results in
>>> build actions involving grafting. For a dry-run, I find that really
>>> odd. I believe t
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 12:18:41AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > I'm totally agree with this; nowadays I always use --dry-run with
> > --no-grafts option.
> Same here…
> > As a user I expect that --dry-run means no building at all.
> But honestly, I think changing ‘--dry-run’ to do ‘--dry-run -
Hi!
Alex Kost skribis:
> Roel Janssen (2016-07-23 18:11 +0300) wrote:
>
>> Dear Guix,
>>
>> For some time now, running `guix package --dry-run --upgrade' results in
>> build actions involving grafting. For a dry-run, I find that really
>> odd. I believe the correct behavior should be what can
Roel Janssen (2016-07-23 18:11 +0300) wrote:
> Dear Guix,
>
> For some time now, running `guix package --dry-run --upgrade' results in
> build actions involving grafting. For a dry-run, I find that really
> odd. I believe the correct behavior should be what can be achieved
> with: `guix package
On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 05:11:03PM +0200, Roel Janssen wrote:
> For some time now, running `guix package --dry-run --upgrade' results in
> build actions involving grafting. For a dry-run, I find that really
> odd. I believe the correct behavior should be what can be achieved
> with: `guix package
Dear Guix,
For some time now, running `guix package --dry-run --upgrade' results in
build actions involving grafting. For a dry-run, I find that really
odd. I believe the correct behavior should be what can be achieved
with: `guix package --dry-run --no-grafts --upgrade'.
Do you think the behav
20 matches
Mail list logo
