On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 06:06:26AM +, John Kehayias wrote:
> I suppose I should have been more specific than "something bad" :) I
> merely meant this wasn't an actual security issue of losing control of
> a private key, but merely moving to a new one for other reasons.
The old key "expired" la
On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 11:16 AM, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2023, at 22:17, John Kehayias wrote:
>> And I assume all this was just to use a new key (did I see some
>> mention of subkeys on #guix? that's what I use) and not because of
>> something bad happening to the old one right?
>
>
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023, at 22:17, John Kehayias wrote:
> And I assume all this was just to use a new key (did I see some
> mention of subkeys on #guix? that's what I use) and not because of
> something bad happening to the old one right?
I don't know if anything bad happened to the old key. That's f
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 09:10 PM, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 12:02:33PM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>> Note that I believe you can simply update to your new key yourself.
>> You'll want to add your new key to the keyring branch, then adjust the
>> .guix-authorizations file wit
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 12:02:33PM -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> Note that I believe you can simply update to your new key yourself.
> You'll want to add your new key to the keyring branch, then adjust the
> .guix-authorizations file with its new keygrip.
Thanks, I pushed to 'keyring' as
935e3c9
Hi,
Maxim Cournoyer writes:
> Hi,
>
> Leo Famulari writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm changing my Guix signing key from
>> B0515948F1E7D3C1B98038A02646FA30BACA7F08 to
>> 68407224D3A64EE53EAC6AAC1963757F47FF.
>>
>> Patches to follow. Testing is appreciated!
>
> Thanks for the heads-up!
Note that
