Leo Famulari skribis:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 01:05:35PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 03:02:13PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> > So GnuTLS already doesn’t build on core-updates, right? In that case,
>> > we should go ahead an update it.
>>
>> I built 3.5.2 on maste
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 01:05:35PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 03:02:13PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > So GnuTLS already doesn’t build on core-updates, right? In that case,
> > we should go ahead an update it.
>
> I built 3.5.2 on master, but now there is another tes
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 03:02:13PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> So GnuTLS already doesn’t build on core-updates, right? In that case,
> we should go ahead an update it.
I built 3.5.2 on master, but now there is another test failure,
'testdsa'. I've attached the log.
It appears that the test r
Leo Famulari skribis:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 12:48:55PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 01:33:34PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
>> > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gnutls: Fix test failure.
>> >
>> > * gnu/packages/patches/gnutls-fix-stale-test.patch: New file.
>> > * gnu/local.mk
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 12:48:55PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 01:33:34PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gnutls: Fix test failure.
> >
> > * gnu/packages/patches/gnutls-fix-stale-test.patch: New file.
> > * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Add it.
> >
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 12:48:55PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 01:33:34PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gnutls: Fix test failure.
> >
> > * gnu/packages/patches/gnutls-fix-stale-test.patch: New file.
> > * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Add it.
> >
On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 01:33:34PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gnutls: Fix test failure.
>
> * gnu/packages/patches/gnutls-fix-stale-test.patch: New file.
> * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Add it.
> * gnu/packages/tls.scm (gnutls)[replacement]: New field.
> (gnutls/fixed):
Leo Famulari skribis:
> From 55512c47d6331109a82acc083ad5ea905d386be7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Leo Famulari
> Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2016 13:07:35 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gnutls: Fix test failure.
>
> * gnu/packages/patches/gnutls-fix-stale-test.patch: New file.
> * gnu/local.mk (dist_p
On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 03:25:46PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Interesting failure mode.
"Interesting" is one word for it ;) It's not the first time I've seen a
test go stale.
> In the meantime grafting is a good idea. Would you like to try that?
A patch is attached for review!
From 55512c4
Leo Famulari skribis:
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 09:04:47PM +0200, nee wrote:
>> ./certtool: line 83: datefudge: command not found
>>
>> You need datefudge to run this test
>>
>> FAIL: name-constraints
>> ==
>>
>> Loaded 3 certificates, 1 CAs and 0 CRLs
>>
>> Subject:
On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 03:32:06AM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> The test certificates have expired.
> I think we need to apply this patch with a graft, from the gnutls_3_4_x
> branch:
> https://gitlab.com/gnutls/gnutls/commit/47f25d9e08d4e102572804a2aed186b01db23c65
I think the package is still av
On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 09:04:47PM +0200, nee wrote:
> ./certtool: line 83: datefudge: command not found
>
> You need datefudge to run this test
>
> FAIL: name-constraints
> ==
>
> Loaded 3 certificates, 1 CAs and 0 CRLs
>
> Subject: C=US,O=Foo Bar Inc.,CN=Foo Bar Sub
Hello, I did a guix pull today and now gnutls fails it's test suite.
In case it matters: I originally installed the 0.9.0 binary and updated
only with guix pull
and guix package -u in the meantime.
guix-daemon --version
gives me
guix-daemon (GNU Guix) 0.9.0
==
13 matches
Mail list logo
