Il 06/06/2013 06:40, Simon Cropper ha scritto:
Hi Guys,
Operating System: Ubuntu 13.04 (using Gnome Classic Interface).
gvSIG Version 2.0.0.2066
Java version: 1.6.0_20
**PROBLEM**
I have a MultiSurface3D ESRI shapefile.
I have tried but can't seem to convert it to something that gvSIG
Antonio Falciano wrote:
Il 06/06/2013 06:40, Simon Cropper ha scritto:
Hi Guys,
Operating System: Ubuntu 13.04 (using Gnome Classic Interface).
gvSIG Version 2.0.0.2066
Java version: 1.6.0_20
**PROBLEM**
I have a MultiSurface3D ESRI shapefile.
I have tried but can't seem
Antonio,
I was unable to find this tool in the toolbox/sextante+gvSIG_geoprocesses!
So no, I have not used this function...
On 06/06/13 16:49, Antonio Falciano wrote:
Il 06/06/2013 06:40, Simon Cropper ha scritto:
Hi Guys,
Operating System: Ubuntu 13.04 (using Gnome Classic Interface).
Jukka,
To be honest nor have I.
This is what is reported in the gvSIG layer properties dialog.
On 06/06/13 17:02, Rahkonen Jukka wrote:
Antonio Falciano wrote:
Il 06/06/2013 06:40, Simon Cropper ha scritto:
Hi Guys,
Operating System: Ubuntu 13.04 (using Gnome Classic Interface).
gvSIG
Simon,
I can't check it now in gvSIG 2.0, but Remove3DM tool should be available in
SEXTANTE bundled with gvSIG 1.12 for sure.
Cheers,
Antonio
--
Antonio Falciano
Inviato da dispositivo mobile
Simon Cropper simoncrop...@fossworkflowguides.com ha scritto:
Antonio,
I was unable to find this
pls, errase me from the mailing list.
thnks!
Best Regards,
Elisabet A.
Diplomada en Geografía, UB
___
Gvsig_internacional mailing list
Gvsig_internacional@listserv.gva.es
To see the archives, edit your preferences or unsubscribe from this mailing
El 06/06/13 10:44, Simon Cropper escribió:
Jukka,
To be honest nor have I.
This is what is reported in the gvSIG layer properties dialog.
Hi,
The MultiSurface3D type is the gvSIG geometry type name, not the Shape
type name, as it is independent of the data source type.
The relationship
El 06/06/13 11:14, Elisabet Adeva escribió:
pls, errase me from the mailing list.
thnks!
Best Regards,
Elisabet A.
Diplomada en Geografía, UB
___
Gvsig_internacional mailing list
Gvsig_internacional@listserv.gva.es
To see the archives, edit your
Simon, would you be able to share the shapefile with us so we can try
to find what is happening?
I have I sent them to Joaquin del Cerro
On 06/06/13 19:43, Cèsar Ordiñana wrote:
El 06/06/13 10:44, Simon Cropper escribió:
Jukka,
To be honest nor have I.
This is what is reported in the
Dear list,
a colleague informed me about an existing problem with a gvSIG 1.11 project:
When she tries to open it,
the following message pops up:
Error opening document:Ohne Titel 1 - ProjectView
Everything in the project except for the map section in the project manager
remains empty. No
Il 06/06/2013 13:31, georgsedlmeir ha scritto:
Dear list,
a colleague informed me about an existing problem with a gvSIG 1.11 project:
When she tries to open it,
the following message pops up:
Error opening document:Ohne Titel 1 - ProjectView
Everything in the project except for the map
Dear Antonio,
that was spot-on, thank you so much! Problem solved.
Best,
Georg
--
View this message in context:
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/gvSIG-1-11-Error-opening-document-ProjectView-tp5058373p5058403.html
Sent from the gvSIG users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Il 06/06/2013 14:23, georgsedlmeir ha scritto:
Dear Antonio,
that was spot-on, thank you so much! Problem solved.
Don't mention it, Georg. :)
This issue sometimes happens also on gvSIG 1.12. It can be reproduced
renaming a layer in the ToC with an empty string and saving the gvSIG
project.
Hi all,
I have three fundamental questions about the different project files
formats of gvSIG 1.x and gvSIG 2.0 versions:
1) What are the main differences between the .gvp and .gvproj files?
2) Will an Import .gvp file tool be developed in gvSIG 2.0?
3) Why do .gvproj files seem to be more closed
Hi Cesar,
There is any reason to choose that names, surface and so on, instead
the more common denominations?
2013/6/6 Simon Cropper simoncrop...@fossworkflowguides.com:
Simon, would you be able to share the shapefile with us so we can try
to find what is happening?
I have I sent them to
Hi Fran,
That names are based in the GML specification AFAIK.
Cheers.
2013/6/6 Francisco Puga fp...@cartolab.es
Hi Cesar,
There is any reason to choose that names, surface and so on, instead
the more common denominations?
2013/6/6 Simon Cropper simoncrop...@fossworkflowguides.com:
Hi,
Thanks to the work of Jorge Piera they are really based on the ISO
19107:2003 [1], which specifies conceptual schemas for describing the
spatial characteristics of geographic features.
GML (ISO 19136:2007) [2] is a XML encoding compliant with the previous
ISO, so geometry types are
El 06/06/13 16:08, Antonio Falciano escribió:
Hi all,
I have three fundamental questions about the different project files
formats of gvSIG 1.x and gvSIG 2.0 versions:
1) What are the main differences between the .gvp and .gvproj files?
2) Will an Import .gvp file tool be developed in gvSIG
2013/6/6 Cèsar Ordiñana cordiny...@gvsig.com
Hi,
Thanks to the work of Jorge Piera they are really based on the ISO
19107:2003 [1], which specifies conceptual schemas for describing the
spatial characteristics of geographic features.
GML (ISO 19136:2007) [2] is a XML encoding compliant
Hi Guys,
Operating System: Ubuntu 13.04 (using Gnome Classic Interface).
gvSIG Version 2.0.0.2066
Java version: 1.6.0_20
**PROBLEM**
When I create a grid in a map after inserting a view, the grid is offset
displaying in the top right of the actual window rather than centred
over the view.
--
20 matches
Mail list logo
