RE: [h-cost] Historical Films: fact vs. fiction

2006-04-25 Thread Sharon at Collierfam.com
very well done! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 7:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [h-cost] Historical Films: fact vs. fiction In a message dated 4/24/2006 7:52:39 A.M. Eastern

Re: [h-cost] Historical Films: fact vs. fiction

2006-04-24 Thread Kimiko Small
At 03:11 AM 4/24/2006, you wrote: Why else would Hollywood have the balls to make the new Titanic movie that is comming out this summer...the one where they find Jack Dawson's body frozen in a block of ice at the bottom of the North Atlantic, bring him to the surface, thaw him out and he's perf

Re: [h-cost] Historical Films: fact vs. fiction

2006-04-24 Thread Kelly Grant
ius Merlyn Britannicus From: Lavolta Press <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Historical Costume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Historical Costume <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [h-cost] Historical Films: fact vs. fiction Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 10:21:09 -0700 Sorry, I meant you _don't

Re: [h-cost] Historical Films: fact vs. fiction

2006-04-24 Thread Lavolta Press
Sorry, I meant you _don't_ have to be a history nerd to be skeptical of advertising. Or even a science nerd. Fran Lavolta Press wrote: kelly grant wrote: I think most modern people have both a healthy skeptism about advertising, and an awareness that fiction (including films) is not rea

Re: [h-cost] Historical Films: fact vs. fiction

2006-04-24 Thread Lloyd Mitchell
AMEN! Kathleen - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 10:11 AM Subject: Re: [h-cost] Historical Films: fact vs. fiction > > In a message dated 4/24/2006 6:12:59 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTE

Re: [h-cost] Historical Films: fact vs. fiction

2006-04-24 Thread Lavolta Press
kelly grant wrote: I think most modern people have both a healthy skeptism about advertising, and an awareness that fiction (including films) is not reality. I would have to disagree with you on the 'most modern people' part of your statement. I think that history nerds, of which I am a pr

Re: [h-cost] Historical Films: fact vs. fiction

2006-04-24 Thread AlbertCat
In a message dated 4/24/2006 7:52:39 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vD4OnHCRd_4 Hysterical! ___ h-costume mailing list h-costume@mail.indra.com http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume

Re: [h-cost] Historical Films: fact vs. fiction

2006-04-24 Thread AlbertCat
In a message dated 4/24/2006 7:01:05 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: But ice floats! * Yeahbut Jack's so full of crap, he sinks. ___ h-costume mailing list h-costume@mail.indra.com http://mail.indra.com/mai

Re: [h-cost] Historical Films: fact vs. fiction

2006-04-24 Thread AlbertCat
In a message dated 4/24/2006 6:12:59 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Why else would Hollywood have the balls to make the new Titanic movie that is comming out this summer...the one where they find Jack Dawson's body frozen in a block of ice at the bottom of the North

Re: [h-cost] Historical Films: fact vs. fiction

2006-04-24 Thread Becky
y, April 24, 2006 7:46 AM Subject: Re: [h-cost] Historical Films: fact vs. fiction Why else would Hollywood have the balls to make the new Titanic movie that is comming out this summer...the one where they find Jack Dawson's body frozen in a block of ice at the bottom of the North Atlantic

Re: [h-cost] Historical Films: fact vs. fiction

2006-04-24 Thread kelly grant
Same trailer, but not the same site...thank Christ! it's a fake... Kelly http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vD4OnHCRd_4 You mean the fake trailer? These are clips from previous movies (I definitely spotted a Romeo and Juliet shot) and mention of the "warm liquid goo phase" comes from the first Aus

Re: [h-cost] Historical Films: fact vs. fiction

2006-04-24 Thread Lloyd Mitchell
At least they had some imagination in not calling this "The Thing III"! Kathleen - Original Message - From: "kelly grant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Historical Costume" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 6:11 AM Subject: [h-cost]

Re: [h-cost] Historical Films: fact vs. fiction

2006-04-24 Thread michaela
Why else would Hollywood have the balls to make the new Titanic movie that > is comming out this summer...the one where they find Jack Dawson's body > frozen in a block of ice at the bottom of the North Atlantic, bring him to > the surface, thaw him out and he's perfectly healthy! I saw the traile

RE: [h-cost] Historical Films: fact vs. fiction

2006-04-24 Thread Sharon at Collierfam.com
But ice floats! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of kelly grant Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 3:12 AM To: Historical Costume Subject: [h-cost] Historical Films: fact vs. fiction > I think most modern people have both a healthy skeptism ab

[h-cost] Historical Films: fact vs. fiction

2006-04-24 Thread kelly grant
I think most modern people have both a healthy skeptism about advertising, and an awareness that fiction (including films) is not reality. I would have to disagree with you on the 'most modern people' part of your statement. I think that history nerds, of which I am a proud member ;-), are in