On Thu, 6 May 2021 17:48:33 +0200
Hiltjo Posthuma wrote:
Dear Hiltjo,
> The patch looks fine. I'm not in favor of some of the const changes,
> but I think it makes sense to make function parameters like for
> xstrdup() const.
>
> I'll review and push it later.
const-correctness saved me from
On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 04:33:35PM +0200, Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer wrote:
> Hi Laslo,
>
> On 2021-05-06 16:19, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> > On Thu, 6 May 2021 16:11:33 +0200
> > "Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer" wrote:
> >
> > Dear Markus,
> >
> >> this is my first post to this list, so I hope I got the
Hi Laslo,
On 2021-05-06 16:19, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> On Thu, 6 May 2021 16:11:33 +0200
> "Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer" wrote:
>
> Dear Markus,
>
>> this is my first post to this list, so I hope I got the email patch
>> right.
>>
>> GitHub repo is at
>>
On Thu, 6 May 2021 16:11:33 +0200
"Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer" wrote:
Dear Markus,
> this is my first post to this list, so I hope I got the email patch
> right.
>
> GitHub repo is at
> https://github.com/markus-oberhumer/suckless-st/compare/mild-const-correctness-improvements
thanks for your
Hi,
this is my first post to this list, so I hope I got the email patch right.
GitHub repo is at
https://github.com/markus-oberhumer/suckless-st/compare/mild-const-correctness-improvements
Cheers,
Markus
--
Markus Oberhumer, , http://www.oberhumer.com/
From
