On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 19:45:00 +0100 (+0100), Keith Edmunds wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:25:10 +0100, james.dut...@gmail.com said:
>
> > Does anyone know of any open source backup programs that do de-dupe
> > for the express purposes of reducing traffic over the WAN.
>
> BackupPC. Recommende
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:25:10 +0100, james.dut...@gmail.com said:
> If two sites have the same data, and one site has already sent the
> initial backup seeding to the central site, the second site should not
> need to also send the same data.
Further to my earlier reply: yes, it does need to send
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:25:10 +0100, james.dut...@gmail.com said:
> Does anyone know of any open source backup programs that do de-dupe
> for the express purposes of reducing traffic over the WAN.
BackupPC. Recommended.
--
Keith Edmunds
+-
My company is currently looking to recruit a Linux support consultant. If
you may be interested, you can find the details at
http://www.tiger-computing.co.uk/misc/linux-support-consultant.html
Any enquiries regarding the role to the address on that page, please.
Keith
--
Please post to: Hampshir
FYI
I have a bunch of stuff I could do with dropping off there is anybody is
driving down from the Basingstoke area and has some car space?
I'd be happy to contribute to petrol for the trip.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jamie's Computers
Date: Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 4:36 PM
Subje
Hi,
I have used a fair amount of different open source network backup
products, e.g. rdiff, bacula etc.
None of them do de-dupe in order to reduce the amount of data sent over the WAN.
Does anyone know of any open source backup programs that do de-dupe
for the express purposes of reducing traffic
On 13 July 2010 20:22, Sean Gibbins wrote:
>
> Did anyone else initially read the subject as 'Linux RAM sausages'?
>
> *sigh*
>
> Sean
>
Must have been watching those Sex Ed programs on Channel 4 recently. ;-)
I was quite surprised how explicit they were. Almost cracked my sides
laughing!!!
--
P
Chris Dennis wrote:
On 13/07/10 20:22, Sean Gibbins wrote:
Did anyone else initially read the subject as 'Linux RAM sausages'?
*sigh*
No. You must be hungry.
But now you mention it - Hmm sausage and bacon sarnies.
Must stop for brekkies now.
Jacqui
--
Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.
