On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 01:31:13 -0500
Mat Grove wrote:
> PS. I think this is the longest single message I have ever seen to
> any Lug mailing list. You get the high score.
An honour which immediately passes to you, Mat, since you quoted
the whole of LL's email and added a bit of your own!
Simon
>
Dude,
I realise it is regarding stuff that happened on the list so arguably is more on
topic than when people talk about their pet hamsters on here. But please, can we
talk about Linux again?
It genuinely makes me sad to read this kind of exchange on this list.
Mat :(
PS. I think this is the l
Andy Smith wrote:
> and I would urge anyone reading this to not take allegations made by
> "LinuxLearner" at face value. Subscribing to Surrey LUG and then
> perusing their (sadly closed) archives will be enlightening.
It's taken me some considerable time to reflect on how, if at all, to
respond
Andy Smith wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In general I have no interest in responding to "LinuxLearner"'s
> trolling, but he has made some accusations which I feel I need to
> set straight for the record. This is a publicly archived mailing
> list and his unfortunate post may be stumbled upon by anyone.
Th
Andy Smith wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In general I have no interest in responding to "LinuxLearner"'s
> trolling, but he has made some accusations which I feel I need to
> set straight for the record. This is a publicly archived mailing
> list and his unfortunate post may be stumbled upon by anyone.
An
Hello,
In general I have no interest in responding to "LinuxLearner"'s
trolling, but he has made some accusations which I feel I need to
set straight for the record. This is a publicly archived mailing
list and his unfortunate post may be stumbled upon by anyone.
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 02:19:52
