Hi there,
2008/10/28 Vu Do Quynh
> Anyway, What I observed is the increased amount of RAM being used
> through the versions of Ubuntu. I have a 512 Mb RAM laptop which is 4
> years old, and I can see that now RAM is completely used up by the
> system and that some swap space start to be used, wh
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 7:46 PM, Clarious wrote:
> I know that why the underlying hardware is still the same, the software
> demands grow up. But in this case, why should newer version of Ubuntu is
> slower?
That is understandable: newer version has more features, more code, so
gets slower. Optim
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 6:50 PM, Vu Do Quynh wrote:
> Nguyen Vu Hung a ?crit :
>
>> It is nonsense to compare two versions of Ubuntu on the same hardware,
>> because new software doesn't mean better performance but more computer
>> resources.
>
> Not really : say I have a computer for 3/4 years an
2008/10/28 NAHieu
>Why not? kernel size increases crazily between versions.
Umm, I am not a kernel hacker, but I have read several documentations about
linux kernel. If I am not wrong, the increasement of code size in linux is
mainly due to new drivers. Performance is related to memory managerme
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:41 PM, Clarious wrote:
> Hello everyone!
>
> I have just read this page:
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ubuntu_bench_2008&num=1
>
> It has some benchmarks regarding different versions of Ubuntu (7.04 to
> 8.10), and the result shows that newer versi
Nguyen Vu Hung a ?crit :
>> It's quite sure that Ubuntu 8.04 is more RAM consuming than previous
>> versions. If you get 1 Gb RAM, you'll see that > 700 MB of RAM is
>> already used by the system after having booted to the GNOME desktop
>> environment.
> How about xfce( latest) and Mozilla 1.0? :
Clarious a ?crit :
> How strange, my system after booting up with Ubuntu 7.10 consume
> ~171MB Ram (with Compiz), no swap used, while with Ubuntu 8.04 the
> number is ~225MB Ram (compiz), still no swap used.
It would be interesting for sure if you could make a comparison of
memory usage by process
I know that why the underlying hardware is still the same, the software
demands grow up. But in this case, why should newer version of Ubuntu is
slower? The kernel should not be the problem here, right? Then it might be
the software, but I don't think the different between OO 2.4 and 3.0 is that
gr
Nguyen Vu Hung a ?crit :
> It is nonsense to compare two versions of Ubuntu on the same hardware,
> because new software doesn't mean better performance but more computer
> resources.
Not really : say I have a computer for 3/4 years and I upgraded to every
new versions of Ubuntu (say from 6.06 to
, whatever distros.
Kind regards,
Tuan
- Original Message -
From: "Clarious"
To: "Hanoi Linux Users Group"
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2008 8:41:33 PM GMT +07:00 Bangkok, Hanoi, Jakarta
Subject: [HanoiLUG] Ubuntu is getting slower with each version?
Hello everyone!
I
Hello everyone!
I have just read this page:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ubuntu_bench_2008&num=1
It has some benchmarks regarding different versions of Ubuntu (7.04 to
8.10), and the result shows that newer version of Ubuntu is slower than the
older ones. I haven't used Ubun
11 matches
Mail list logo