check it here: http://haproxy.1wt.eu/download/1.3/doc/configuration.txt
30. lbtot: total number of times a server was selected
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Sun Yijiang sunyiji...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi you guys,
I noticed that there's a huge gap between ``Total'' and ``LbTot'' numbers
Yeah, that's clear, thanks. I just wonder why ``LbTot'' is much smaller
than ``Total''.
2009/3/17 FinalBSD final...@gmail.com
check it here: http://haproxy.1wt.eu/download/1.3/doc/configuration.txt
30. lbtot: total number of times a server was selected
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 1:56 PM,
Mine don't appear to have that much difference. Are any of the servers
down, or maybe reaching their session limits? What's your retr and redis
look like?
From: Sun Yijiang [mailto:sunyiji...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:18 AM
To: kuan...@mail.51.com
Cc: haproxy@formilux.org
Hi All
I am using haproxy to load balance/failover on a couple of my dev HTTP
servers and it works really well.
I would like to introduce hardware redundancy for the haproxy server, is
this possible with the software?
Best Regards
Scott Pinhorne
Tel: 0845 862 0371
Not built into Haproxy, but you can use heartbeat or keepalived along with
haproxy for IP takeover on a pair of physical boxes (or VMs).
From: Scott Pinhorne [mailto:scott.pinho...@voxit.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 10:52 AM
To: haproxy@formilux.org
Subject: Multiple Proxies
Hi
Scott,
John is right, the way to do this is to use either heartbeat or
keepalive and fail over a VIP to a secondary machine in case the first
has issues. Make sure your haproxy files are identical and then test
the failover.
We use heartbeat for one of our clients and so far any time I
On 2009-03-17, Joseph Hardeman jharde...@colocube.com wrote:
John is right, the way to do this is to use either heartbeat or
keepalive and fail over a VIP to a secondary machine in case the first
has issues. Make sure your haproxy files are identical and then test
the failover.
I would
You need to explain a little more, as I am not understating something.
Perhaps what you mean by VIP?
If they share the same single VIP at the same time, then why would you use
round-robin DNS? Round-robin is for multiple IP addresses...?
Also, if you do a virtual IP like Microsoft Windows does
On 2009-03-17, John Lauro john.la...@covenanteyes.com wrote:
You need to explain a little more, as I am not understating something.
Perhaps what you mean by VIP?
Virtual IP address. With heartbeat, one normally has one staticly defined
ip-address on the frontend interface on each server, and
Backend servers were down about 2 hours during the 37 hour up time. Session
limits have been reached for frontend and all backend servers. Retr 138,
Redis 0 for Backend.
2009/3/17 John Lauro john.la...@covenanteyes.com
Mine don’t appear to have that much difference. Are any of the servers
10 matches
Mail list logo
