Hello,
Yes I know that session stickyness is enabled and this is what we need.
The problem is that when we make load tests with for example 10 concurrent
new users and 5 backend servers, we
noticed that some servers handle for example 4 users and other servers
handle only one. Is it normal?
C
On 18-8-2009 16:34, Johan Duflost wrote:
Hello,
Here is an excerpt of our config file :
appsession ASP.NET_SessionId len 52 timeout 1h
cookie ASP.NET_SessionId prefix
option persist
balance roundrobin
option forwardfor
option httpclose
ser
Hello,
Here is an excerpt of our config file :
appsession ASP.NET_SessionId len 52 timeout 1h
cookie ASP.NET_SessionId prefix
option persist
balance roundrobin
option forwardfor
option httpclose
server 1 xx.xx.xx.xx:80 cookie 1 check inter 3000 r
Witalis,
Is the LVS instance and the Haproxy instance on the same server?
HAproxy -> LVS DR (local node) is not possible, HAproxy -> LVS NAT can
be done with the latest kernel or a patched one.
If they are on separate nodes I don't see why it wouldn't work.
2009/8/18 Witold Duranek
>
> Hi,
>
>
On 18-8-2009 14:08, Johan Duflost wrote:
Hello,
We have a farm of asp.net web servers behind haproxy configured with
round-robin.
It seems to work but in fact the requests are not evenly distributed.
All the servers have the same capacity and there's no priority declared
in the haproxy confi
Hello,
We have a farm of asp.net web servers behind haproxy configured with
round-robin.
It seems to work but in fact the requests are not evenly distributed.
All the servers have the same capacity and there's no priority declared in the
haproxy configuration file.
Does anybody know why it doesn
Hi,
I am having small architecture of two apache server with LVS
loadbalancer in DR mode. I've installed haproxy (1.3.20) in front of
eache apache server to protect them against slowloris with this
haproxy config:
global
daemon
user hpr
group hpr
maxconn 2
7 matches
Mail list logo
