Thanks again, Aleks and Willy.
This is finally working - not an elegant solution, but as a workaround a
SERVERID cookie can be appended onto the request header using Apache mod_header
that mimics the one inserted by HAproxy on outgoing responses. So, basically
HAproxy sees a "normal" client re
On Mit 28.10.2009 17:12, Dirk Taggesell wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim wrote:
what version of haproxy is this?
Ah sorry. It is 1.3.17
Is it possible to update to 1.3.22 yust to be on the save side ;-)
### http://haproxy.1wt.eu/
Let's put it short : those of you r
Hi,
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:39:03 +, Matt wrote:
> Think I figured it out now.
>
> I'm using an acl to push the request to a backend that contains the
> external server. In the backend i'm then rewriting the url.
>
> What are the reasons most people seem to front haproxy with apache or
> ngi
BTW: sorry for the somewhat wierd looking thread. I forgot to manually
include haproxy@formilux.org as recipient and manually re-sent it afterwards
to the list - for the sake of completeness.
And I am forced to use this abomination of a mail reader called google mail,
because my mail relay at 1un
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim wrote:
> it looks like Karsten's suspicion is correct. Try adding the
> 'Content-length: 0' header. haproxy is still expecting more data from the
> backend. (It apparently does not know about status 204???).
>
thanks, Jeffrey and Karsten,
I forw
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim wrote:
what version of haproxy is this?
>
Ah sorry. It is 1.3.17
> do 200 requests from the same backend passed through haproxy work?
>
Yes, haproxy generally works when i test it with an ordinary Apache as
back-end instead of the custom app.
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 2:05 PM, John Lauro wrote:
> You could run mode tcp if you setup haproxy in transparent mode .
>
The docs say: Note that contrary to a common belief, this option does
NOT make HAProxy present the client's IP to the server when establishing
the connection.
Which makes sen
Oops, me bad. that's technically right. I was burned by this terminology
too. What is considered transparent mode is actually good if you want to
proxy the world instead of your servers, and it can be combined with usesrc.
Anyways, what I should of said was you can make Haproxy present the
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 9:54 PM, Dirk Taggesell <
dirk.tagges...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim wrote:
>
> what version of haproxy is this?
>>
>
> Ah sorry. It is 1.3.17
>
>
>> do 200 requests from the same backend passed through haproxy work?
>>
>
> Ye
Hi,
most 502 errors in haproxy responses come from "bad" backend responses.
Could you try adding a "Content-Length: 0" header to the backend response? I
don't know if RFC requires it in a 204 response.
btw. the expires date in your setcookie looks a bit strange. 0059, 1959 or
2059?
Karsten
Am
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Dirk Taggesell <
dirk.tagges...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I want to load balance a new server application that generally sends
> http code 204 - to save bandwidth and to avoid client-side caching.
> In fact it only exchanges cookie data, thus no real con
You could run mode tcp if you setup haproxy in transparent mode .
From: Dirk Taggesell [mailto:dirk.tagges...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 9:03 AM
To: haproxy@formilux.org
Subject: Backend sends 204, haproxy sends 502
Hi all,
I want to load balance a new server applic
Hi all,
I want to load balance a new server application that generally sends
http code 204 - to save bandwidth and to avoid client-side caching.
In fact it only exchanges cookie data, thus no real content is delivered
anyway.
When requests are made via haproxy, the backend - as intended - deliver
Think I figured it out now.
I'm using an acl to push the request to a backend that contains the
external server. In the backend i'm then rewriting the url.
What are the reasons most people seem to front haproxy with apache or nginx?
Thanks,
Matt
2009/10/27 Matt :
> Hi,
>
> I've managed to rew
On Die 27.10.2009 20:37, Robinson, Michael wrote:
Thanks for the reply, Aleks.
appsession lookup in URL does not seem to work for me.
Please can you rebuild haproxy with
DEBUG=-DDEBUG_HASH
and run it with -db to see what's in the hash.
The request, as it appears in HTTP access_log:
64.88.
15 matches
Mail list logo
