Hi,
On 13 February 2013 08:11, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
Hi Marc-Antoine,
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:53:54AM +0100, Marc-Antoine Perennou wrote:
+systemd/haproxy.service: contrib/systemd/haproxy.service.in
+ mkdir -p systemd
+ sed -e 's:@SBINDIR@:'$(strip $(SBINDIR))':' $
Signed-off-by: Marc-Antoine Perennou marc-anto...@perennou.com
---
.gitignore | 1 +
contrib/systemd/Makefile | 8
contrib/systemd/haproxy.service.in | 11 +++
3 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 contrib/systemd/Makefile
Huh ? It is already present a few lines above :
Correct, I was just confused about it because the other keywords like
defer-accept or v4v6 are also present twice and tfo was missing below
the comment: /* the versions with the NULL parse function*/.
lukas@ubuntuvm:~/haproxy-ss-20130125/src$
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 04:03:14AM +0100, Krzysztof Olędzki wrote:
On 2013-02-12 02:45, Simon Horman wrote:
This corrects what appears to be logic errors in cut_crlf().
I assume that the intention of this function is to truncate a
string at the first cr or lf. However, currently lf are
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 09:40:31AM +0100, Lukas Tribus wrote:
Looks like glibc only has support for TCP_FASTOPEN in the unreleased 2.18
version [1] and I'm using glibc 2.15 here.
OK. Anyway I'm used not to rely on libcs found in the field because many
users upgrade their kernels on supported
Thanks Marc-Antoine, I've applied all your patches now.
Willy
Hi Simon,
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:45:47AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
Hi,
this series was previously sent as [PATCH 0/5] Dynamic Health Check.
(...)
OK these patches looked fine, I have applied them all.
Thank you !
Willy
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 11:08:35AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Simon,
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:45:47AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
Hi,
this series was previously sent as [PATCH 0/5] Dynamic Health Check.
(...)
OK these patches looked fine, I have applied them all.
Great,
Hi,
sorry it was long, but I didn't have time to review it earlier.
On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 03:00:42PM +0900, Hiroaki Nakamura wrote:
Hi there.
I saw the mail Re: PCRE = 8.20 JIT support in haproxy = 1.5.x? at
2011-12-27,
and give it a try.
This is a patch for using PCRE JIT in acl.
Anyway I'm used not to rely on libcs found in the field because many
users upgrade their kernels on supported distros. That's why there are so
many defines in the makefile !
So do you think it would make sense to introduce a new build flag for TFO
and define TCP_FASTOPEN?
This would be
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 04:26:24PM +0100, Lukas Tribus wrote:
Anyway I'm used not to rely on libcs found in the field because many
users upgrade their kernels on supported distros. That's why there are so
many defines in the makefile !
So do you think it would make sense to introduce a
If you want I can send patches, but I will have to fix the mailer first.
Yes, please do !
The attached patch fixes the doc/code comments and should reach you
without being mangled.
Lukas
0001-DOC-tfo-bump-required-kernel-to-linux-3.7.patch
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 11:42:27PM +0100, Lukas Tribus wrote:
If you want I can send patches, but I will have to fix the mailer first.
Yes, please do !
The attached patch fixes the doc/code comments and should reach you
without being mangled.
Done, thank you Lukas!
Willy
13 matches
Mail list logo
