Hi guys,
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 04:41:57PM +0200, William Lallemand wrote:
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 04:14:05PM -0400, Patrick Hemmer wrote:
I see 2 ways of handling this.
1) Move the code that populates the session unique_id member to
http_process_req_common (or to http_wait_for_request
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 02:43:03PM +0200, William Lallemand wrote:
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:50:09PM +0200, Lukas Tribus wrote:
The behavior also depends on the syslog facility; I used syslog in my
tests.
With the current git tree I see the following behavior:
ntp and local7:
Hi Evan,
On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 07:44:11PM +0100, Evan Broder wrote:
Although HAProxy can verify the SSL certs of an SSL-enabled server
against a CA chain, it currently doesn't check the actual hostname on
the cert, meaning that it will accept any cert signed by any major CA
(and thus can be
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 01:35:49PM +0200, Nick Jennings wrote:
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 4:40 AM, Amyas am...@yasmolive.com wrote:
Nick Jennings nick@... writes:
I'm running CentOS 6 with a 2.6.18 kernel, aside from a few
additional packages via the EPEL, there
are no
Hello Ricardo,
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 11:27:45AM +0200, Ricardo F wrote:
Hello,
I have an issue when trying to track a connection based on a header, with
tcp-request, and with keep alive enable in a listen section.
Over the haproxy i have a cdn, which pass the ip of the client at the
Hi Lukas,
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 10:27:34AM +0200, Lukas Tribus wrote:
Is there a way to redispatch the requests to other servers ignoring the
persistence on queue timeout?
No; after a queue timeout (configurable by timeout queue), haproxy will
drop the request.
Think of what would
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 02:10:50PM +0530, Sachin Shetty wrote:
Thanks Lukas.
Yes, I was hoping to workaround by setting a smaller maxqueue limit and
queue timeout.
So what other options do we have, I need to:
1. Send all requests for a host (mytest.mydomain.com) to one backend as
long as
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 12:26:18PM -0700, Bryan Talbot wrote:
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 4:29 AM, Erwin Schliske erwin.schli...@sevenval.com
wrote:
bind0.0.0.0:443 ssl crt /etc/ssl/private/concat cert + privkey
ciphers ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:**ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:**
Thanks Willy.
I am precisely using it for caching. I need requests to go to the same
nodes for cache hits, but when the node is already swamped I would prefer
a cache miss over a 503.
Thanks
Sachin
On 8/31/13 12:57 PM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 02:10:50PM +0530,
See that header in your e-mail ?
In-Reply-To: 20130822070159.gb26...@1wt.eu
It causes your mail to be part of the thread about Simon's patches.
This is because instead of sending a new e-mail, your preferred to
reply to an unrelated one. Please do not do that in the future, it
makes it harder
We did try consistent hashing, but I found better distribution without it.
We don¹t add or remove servers often so we should be ok. Our total pool is
sized correctly and we are able to serve 100% requests when we use
roundrobin, however sticky on host is what causes some nodes to hit
maxconn. My
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 01:27:41PM +0530, Sachin Shetty wrote:
We did try consistent hashing, but I found better distribution without it.
That's known and normal.
We don¹t add or remove servers often so we should be ok.
It depends on what you do with them in fact, because most places will
not
Yes, no-queue is what I am looking for. If consistent hashing is easier to
accommodate this change, I won't mind switching to consistent hashing when
the fix is available. Right now with no support for maxqueue failover,
consistent hashing is even more severe for our use case.
Thanks again Willy.
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 02:25:47PM +0530, Sachin Shetty wrote:
Yes, no-queue is what I am looking for. If consistent hashing is easier to
accommodate this change,
I wouldn't say it's easier, better that it's less complicated :-/
I won't mind switching to consistent hashing when
the fix is
Unable to view this properly, click here
http://ui3.mailzbrain.com/mailz/lt.php?id=ZU0ABAQMVlYHT1FQSlBUUlJWAg%3D%3D
to see it in your browser
http://ui3.mailzbrain.com/mailz/lt.php?id=ZU0ABAQMVlYET1FQSlBUUlJWAg%3D%3D
http://ui3.mailzbrain.com/mailz/lt.php?id=ZU0ABAQMVlYET1FQSlBUUlJWAg%3D%3D
Hi,
I'm having issues implementing
http://blog.exceliance.fr/2013/04/26/wordpress-cms-brute-force-protection-with-haproxy/
described configuration with dev19 due to what seems that following
construct doesn't work:
backend xyz
acl foo sc1_inc_gpc gt 0
http-request deny if foo
In the full
Hi Toni,
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 02:14:55PM +0300, Toni Mattila wrote:
Hi,
I'm having issues implementing
http://blog.exceliance.fr/2013/04/26/wordpress-cms-brute-force-protection-with-haproxy/
described configuration with dev19 due to what seems that following
construct doesn't work:
This message is to inform you of a change of your details on our
newsletter database
You are currently member of the following newsletters:
No Lists
The information on our system for you is as follows:
Email : haproxy@formilux.org
Send HTML email : No
If this is
Title: Savetovanje 2013
Ovaj email sadrži grafičke elemente. Ukoliko imate problema sa otvaranjem istih, pogledajte sadržaj OVDE.
www.paragraf.rs
Pozivamo Vas da se prijavite na Paragrafova savetovanja za septembar 2013.
Hi,
As to respond to my own post.. I have gotten the sc1_inc_gpc0 working
when I define in my frontend:
stick-table type ip size 50k expire 120m store gpc0
tcp-request content track-sc1 src
But if I add to that tcp-request content track-sc1 src if METH_POST then
it doesn't work anymore..
Pour vous, être présent sur Google cest trouver de nouveaux clients.
Mais combien coûte un bon référencement ?
http://www.e-visibilite.com/referencement3.php
Hi Evan,
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 04:20:38PM -0700, Evan Broder wrote:
It is very clean and well documented, good job! It looks OK to me. Do
you want me to merge it now or do you prefer to resend it with the doc ?
It's as you like, just tell me what you prefer.
I've attached a new version
24 matches
Mail list logo