Re: Emulating Active/passing application clustering with HAProxy

2014-02-16 Thread Mark Ruys
Op 16 feb. 2014, om 00:16 heeft Cyril Bonté het volgende geschreven: > Le 16/02/2014 00:00, Mark Ruys a écrit : >> Hi Cyril, >> >> Awesome, that's exactly what I need. Thanks for sharing it, I'll >> definitely implement it this way! > > OK, please feel free to provide some feedbacks once impl

RE: Patch for ALPN compatibility with OpenSSL development

2014-02-16 Thread Lukas Tribus
Hi, > I’ve updated the patch which now does actual negotiation. The logic comes > from the example OpenSSL server application that also was committed in the > commit that adds ALPN support to OpenSSL: Great, it works correctly now. When negotiating spdy I now get a ERR_SPDY_PROTOCOL_ERROR in Chr

Re: Emulating Active/passing application clustering with HAProxy

2014-02-16 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Mark, On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 01:27:18PM +0100, Mark Ruys wrote: > So far, I have one observation: > > > To switch back to the "active" backend : > > # echo "clear table passive" | socat stdio /var/run/haproxy.sock > > Although the table is declared with peer stickiness (stick-table type inte

Re: Patch for ALPN compatibility with OpenSSL development

2014-02-16 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi guys, On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 02:06:11PM +0100, Lukas Tribus wrote: > Hi, > > > > I?ve updated the patch which now does actual negotiation. The logic comes > > from the example OpenSSL server application that also was committed in the > > commit that adds ALPN support to OpenSSL: > > Great,

Re: Patch for ALPN compatibility with OpenSSL development

2014-02-16 Thread Dirkjan Bussink
Hi all, > Yes, of course! The ALPN patch was an early incantation I did based on > initially available patches so that people could start to experiment > with it. Now that we're finally getting closer to something official > in openssl, better stick to it! > > Dirkjan, could you please adjust you

Re: Patch for ALPN compatibility with OpenSSL development

2014-02-16 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 07:45:08PM +0100, Dirkjan Bussink wrote: > Hi all, > > > Yes, of course! The ALPN patch was an early incantation I did based on > > initially available patches so that people could start to experiment > > with it. Now that we're finally getting closer to something official

Re: Patch for ALPN compatibility with OpenSSL development

2014-02-16 Thread Dirkjan Bussink
On 16 Feb 2014, at 19:50, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Great, thank you Dirkjan, I've just merged it now. Thanks for merging it! — Dirkjan