Hi Lukas,
thanks for your helpful reply!
Are you sure about this? Dev23 breaks the build while dev22 builds
correctly, is that what you are saying?
Actually dev22 was the last one I tried from the dev-line. I first
noticed it when building 1.5.0, so apparently the change came at a later
Hi Andrew,
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 03:39:41PM -0500, Andrew Latham wrote:
I waited about a month. Here is a pull request and you can see the
diff also https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/pull/3
OK, I didn't notice that haproxy-* would automatically ignore doc/haproxy-*
simply because there are
Willy
No problem. I will clone and get you a patch. I found this by complete
accident so no worries.
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 7:18 AM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 03:39:41PM -0500, Andrew Latham wrote:
I waited about a month. Here is a pull request and
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 10:05:25PM +0200, Pavlos Parissis wrote:
Hi,
The doc is a bit confusing, at least to me. The former is about TCP
connections and the latter for HTTP requests, am I completely wrong?
Not completely. Originally, we only had sessions and requests. But now
we support
Willy
Diff attached. Happy to help if there are any issues.
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 7:22 AM, Andrew Latham lath...@gmail.com wrote:
Willy
No problem. I will clone and get you a patch. I found this by complete
accident so no worries.
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 7:18 AM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu
Hi Sebastian,
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 09:58:28AM +, Sebastian Sch. wrote:
Hi Lukas,
thanks for your helpful reply!
Are you sure about this? Dev23 breaks the build while dev22 builds
correctly, is that what you are saying?
Actually dev22 was the last one I tried from the
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 07:28:55AM -0500, Andrew Latham wrote:
Willy
Diff attached. Happy to help if there are any issues.
Andrew, if I asked for the format-patch output, it's because it
provides your commit message, your authorship etc...
You just have to do this :
git format-patch -1
Willy
Thanks, was in a hurry, every project is a little different in
process. Attached.
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 07:28:55AM -0500, Andrew Latham wrote:
Willy
Diff attached. Happy to help if there are any issues.
Andrew, if I
Hello Cornelius,
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 12:20:14PM +0200, Cornelius Riemenschneider wrote:
Hello,
we use haproxy 1.5.3 quite successfully with the new agent-checks (a great
feature!)
However, recently we started noticing that our servers were going down with
»DOWN (agent)« as status
Hi Andrew,
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 07:51:12AM -0500, Andrew Latham wrote:
Willy
Thanks, was in a hurry, every project is a little different in
process.
Yes I know :-)
Attached.
Applied to both 1.6 and 1.5. Thank you very much!
Willy
Thanks, Now I know how to send you good high quality code.
BTW, Thanks for HAProxy, it rocks.
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 07:51:12AM -0500, Andrew Latham wrote:
Willy
Thanks, was in a hurry, every project is a little
I am trying to use the dynamic backend selection feature of 1.5, but I am
missing something. Here is a snippet of my configuration:
frontend sledgehammer
bind *:1
option http-pretend-keepalive
default_backend other
capture request header X-Backend len 15
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 03:18:28PM +0200, Cornelius Riemenschneider wrote:
Hello,
I investigated the issue a bit further.
We both use health checks and agent-checks, the health check reports the
usual up/down/connection failed, and the agent-check provides us with a
dynamic weight.
OK.
❦ 7 octobre 2014 14:18 +0200, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu :
I waited about a month. Here is a pull request and you can see the
diff also https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/pull/3
OK, I didn't notice that haproxy-* would automatically ignore doc/haproxy-*
simply because there are currently
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 03:36:58PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
Could you please send your patch here, it's really too much painful to try
to get it from github, I had to give up after 10 minutes not finding any
way to retrieve it :-(
You can just append .patch to the URL to get something
No comments on this? Is there anything that can be done differently?
On 10/05/2014 07:33 PM, Nenad Merdanovic wrote:
Hello,
I accidentally noticed that HAproxy doesn't follow the HTTP standard
when it comes to HEAD requests. Using an 'errofile' directive will
return whatever is inside,
Hi,
2014-10-07 21:52 GMT+02:00 Nenad Merdanovic ni...@nimzo.info:
No comments on this? Is there anything that can be done differently?
Well first, I don't expect HAProxy to change its behaviour between two
versions (and that will be the case with your patch).
So this is your option that
17 matches
Mail list logo