Re: HAProxy 1.5.4 fails to build on Solaris 10 (sparc)

2014-10-07 Thread Sebastian Sch .
Hi Lukas, thanks for your helpful reply! Are you sure about this? Dev23 breaks the build while dev22 builds correctly, is that what you are saying? Actually dev22 was the last one I tried from the dev-line. I first noticed it when building 1.5.0, so apparently the change came at a later

Re: gitignore in tarballs

2014-10-07 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Andrew, On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 03:39:41PM -0500, Andrew Latham wrote: I waited about a month. Here is a pull request and you can see the diff also https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/pull/3 OK, I didn't notice that haproxy-* would automatically ignore doc/haproxy-* simply because there are

Re: gitignore in tarballs

2014-10-07 Thread Andrew Latham
Willy No problem. I will clone and get you a patch. I found this by complete accident so no worries. On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 7:18 AM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote: Hi Andrew, On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 03:39:41PM -0500, Andrew Latham wrote: I waited about a month. Here is a pull request and

Re: maxconnrate VS maxsessrate

2014-10-07 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi, On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 10:05:25PM +0200, Pavlos Parissis wrote: Hi, The doc is a bit confusing, at least to me. The former is about TCP connections and the latter for HTTP requests, am I completely wrong? Not completely. Originally, we only had sessions and requests. But now we support

Re: gitignore in tarballs

2014-10-07 Thread Andrew Latham
Willy Diff attached. Happy to help if there are any issues. On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 7:22 AM, Andrew Latham lath...@gmail.com wrote: Willy No problem. I will clone and get you a patch. I found this by complete accident so no worries. On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 7:18 AM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu

Re: HAProxy 1.5.4 fails to build on Solaris 10 (sparc)

2014-10-07 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Sebastian, On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 09:58:28AM +, Sebastian Sch. wrote: Hi Lukas, thanks for your helpful reply! Are you sure about this? Dev23 breaks the build while dev22 builds correctly, is that what you are saying? Actually dev22 was the last one I tried from the

Re: gitignore in tarballs

2014-10-07 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 07:28:55AM -0500, Andrew Latham wrote: Willy Diff attached. Happy to help if there are any issues. Andrew, if I asked for the format-patch output, it's because it provides your commit message, your authorship etc... You just have to do this : git format-patch -1

Re: gitignore in tarballs

2014-10-07 Thread Andrew Latham
Willy Thanks, was in a hurry, every project is a little different in process. Attached. On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote: On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 07:28:55AM -0500, Andrew Latham wrote: Willy Diff attached. Happy to help if there are any issues. Andrew, if I

Re: Server marked as DOWN (agent) without the agent issuing down

2014-10-07 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hello Cornelius, On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 12:20:14PM +0200, Cornelius Riemenschneider wrote: Hello, we use haproxy 1.5.3 quite successfully with the new agent-checks (a great feature!) However, recently we started noticing that our servers were going down with »DOWN (agent)« as status

Re: gitignore in tarballs

2014-10-07 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Andrew, On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 07:51:12AM -0500, Andrew Latham wrote: Willy Thanks, was in a hurry, every project is a little different in process. Yes I know :-) Attached. Applied to both 1.6 and 1.5. Thank you very much! Willy

Re: gitignore in tarballs

2014-10-07 Thread Andrew Latham
Thanks, Now I know how to send you good high quality code. BTW, Thanks for HAProxy, it rocks. On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote: Hi Andrew, On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 07:51:12AM -0500, Andrew Latham wrote: Willy Thanks, was in a hurry, every project is a little

Dynamic Backend Selection

2014-10-07 Thread B. Heath Robinson
I am trying to use the dynamic backend selection feature of 1.5, but I am missing something. Here is a snippet of my configuration: frontend sledgehammer bind *:1 option http-pretend-keepalive default_backend other capture request header X-Backend len 15

Re: Server marked as DOWN (agent) without the agent issuing down

2014-10-07 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 03:18:28PM +0200, Cornelius Riemenschneider wrote: Hello, I investigated the issue a bit further. We both use health checks and agent-checks, the health check reports the usual up/down/connection failed, and the agent-check provides us with a dynamic weight. OK.

Re: gitignore in tarballs

2014-10-07 Thread Vincent Bernat
❦ 7 octobre 2014 14:18 +0200, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu : I waited about a month. Here is a pull request and you can see the diff also https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/pull/3 OK, I didn't notice that haproxy-* would automatically ignore doc/haproxy-* simply because there are currently

Re: gitignore in tarballs

2014-10-07 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 03:36:58PM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote: Could you please send your patch here, it's really too much painful to try to get it from github, I had to give up after 10 minutes not finding any way to retrieve it :-( You can just append .patch to the URL to get something

Re: HAproxy errorfile and HEAD request

2014-10-07 Thread Nenad Merdanovic
No comments on this? Is there anything that can be done differently? On 10/05/2014 07:33 PM, Nenad Merdanovic wrote: Hello, I accidentally noticed that HAproxy doesn't follow the HTTP standard when it comes to HEAD requests. Using an 'errofile' directive will return whatever is inside,

Re: HAproxy errorfile and HEAD request

2014-10-07 Thread Olivier
Hi, 2014-10-07 21:52 GMT+02:00 Nenad Merdanovic ni...@nimzo.info: No comments on this? Is there anything that can be done differently? Well first, I don't expect HAProxy to change its behaviour between two versions (and that will be the case with your patch). So this is your option that