On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 07:31:28AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 01:10:32PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > the aim of this series is to make the send more email alerts when
> > they are likely to be useful and less when they are likely to be
> > u
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 06:56:23PM -0400, CJ Ess wrote:
> When you run HAProxy in full debugging mode there is a debug_hdrs() call
> that displays all of the http headers read from the frontend, I'd also like
> to be able to see the headers being sent to the backend.
>
> So far I haven't pinpointe
Hi Simon,
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 01:10:32PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the aim of this series is to make the send more email alerts when
> they are likely to be useful and less when they are likely to be
> unwanted.
(...)
Whole series applied, thank you very much!
Willy
On 4/29/2015 3:00 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> How can I be sure that openssl is compiled with support for TLS
> acceleration in the CPU? I am compiling haproxy from source. Would you
> recommend that I install a separate and newer openssl from source for
> explicit use with haproxy, and tweak its c
Lower the priority of email alerts for log-health-checks messages from
LOG_NOTICE to LOG_INFO.
This is to allow set-ups with log-health-checks enabled to disable email
for health check state changes while leaving other email alerts enabled.
In order for email alerts to be sent for health check st
Document the influence of email-alert level and other configuration
parameters on when email-alerts are sent.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman
---
doc/configuration.txt | 9 +
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/doc/configuration.txt b/doc/configuration.txt
index f72339a04588..780d6
This is similar to the way email alerts are sent when servers are marked as
DOWN.
Like the log messages corresponding to these state changes the messages
have log level notice. Thus they are suppressed by the default email-alert
level of 'alert'. To allow these messages the email-alert level shoul
Hi,
the aim of this series is to make the send more email alerts when
they are likely to be useful and less when they are likely to be
unwanted.
Changes in v2:
* As suggested by Willy Tarreau, lower the priority at which email alerts
for of log-health-checks messages are sent rather never send
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 09:24:42AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 02:25:02PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 06:43:38AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > > Hi Simon,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 10:58:56AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> > > > This s
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 04:26:56PM +0530, Krishna Kumar (Engineering) wrote:
>
> Request directly to 1 nginx backend server, size=256 bytes:
>
> Command: ab -k -n 10 -c
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 9:18 AM, iain wrote:
> On 29/04/15 04:26, Baptiste wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> You need to enable the check-ssl on the server line.
>> In your case haproxy sends a check in clear, while the server expects a
>> ciphered connexion.
>
> That's correct, because I am trying to keep the h
On 29/04/2015 12:56 μμ, Krishna Kumar (Engineering) wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Sorry, my lab systems were down for many days and I could not get back
> on this earlier. After
> new systems were allocated, I managed to get all the requested
> information with a fresh ru
> (Sorry, this is a long mail to
I have an existing load balancer installation that I have been slowly
migrating from IPVS to haproxy. It's CentOS 6, so many components are
out of date, such as TLS support.
Once that migration is done, I would like to entirely replace the
hardware and load an ideal software environment for hapro
Hello all,
with HAProxy 1.5.11, we have implemented rate limiting based on some
aspects of the request (Host header, path, ...). In our implementation,
we delay limited requests by forcing a WAIT_END in order to prevent
brute-force attacks against e.g. passwords or login tokens:
acl bruteforce_s
Dear all,
Sorry, my lab systems were down for many days and I could not get back on
this earlier. After
new systems were allocated, I managed to get all the requested information
with a fresh ru
(Sorry, this is a long mail too!). There are now 4 physical servers,
running Debian 3.2.0-4-amd64,
conn
Hello,
Doyoustlllo=okingforpowerbankthatprefectfitintopurse,andsuitabletomake=fullcolorprintinglogo?
Wehaveacreditcardshapep=owerbank,thisitemisbestchoicetocustomyourbrand,plsfind&nbs=p;attachedproductpicture.Thispowerbankcanbeusedforallkindsofmobile=phones.
Features:=1.Slimbattery,morethinn=e
Dearfriend,
Wishyouawonderf=ulday.I'dliketointrod=uceanewproductthathasahighcompetitivepriceandahighlm/w.Welcometocontact=usformoredetailsandlookforwardtogetyourreply.Thanks&BestRegards!Tracy---=-ShenzhenBDLAYElectronics&T
On 29/04/15 04:26, Baptiste wrote:
> Hi,
> You need to enable the check-ssl on the server line.
> In your case haproxy sends a check in clear, while the server expects a
> ciphered connexion.
That's correct, because I am trying to keep the health checks on the
cleartext TCP/25 port.
However, I d
Hey lady or man,Golf trading here, exportingGolf with good quality and low price in china.
We can provide technical support and after sale service ,Able to provide free samples
Call me, let's talk details.
Rgds,
Rick
tel:0
19 matches
Mail list logo