On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 04:50:35PM -0500, Andrew Hayworth wrote:
> Ah, thanks - I hadn't thought about the case where connections were
> queued up. In my tests, I had a very low queue timeout. The code you
> suggested seems to do the trick. Updated patch below.
Applied, thanks. I fixed a minor ind
Hi List,
I wrote a Lua advanced documentation. This explain the Lua integration
in HAProxy, the reason of some choices. Some traps and Lua code with
advanced comments.
This doc is not terminated, but I want to release a first version. I
will fill the missing points later.
unfortunatelly I have s
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:18 AM, Baptiste wrote:
> Ben,
>
> I found a couple of bugs:
> #1 an incomplete end of processing when the queried hostname can't be
> found in the response. This lead to the query loop you may have
> observed.
> #2 an error in the way we parse CNAME responses, leading to
Hi,
On 10/27/2015 08:34 PM, Amol Kedar wrote:
Hi Javier,
yes tcpdump is always an option but my question is can tcpdump on eth0 won’t be
unencrypted so what more can we get from it than what you already have?
If Haproxy doesn't terminate the encryption there is nothing you can do in any
cas
http://lb.enquete-en-or.com/r/?id=t2e412517,20680eb,2068298&p1=haproxy@formilux.org&p2=haproxy@formilux.org
Signaler comme indésirable
Pour visualiser ce message au format html,
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Ben Tisdall wrote:
>
> Thanks Baptiste, will get on this today.
>
Ok this in the test environment now and the "other" counter now
increments in step with "valid", eg:
Resolvers section aws
nameserver aws_0:
sent: 208
valid: 104
update: 0
cname: 0
cnam
Hello,
This is a simple diff to the main README for adding more DeviceAtlas's
convertor / sample fetch use cases.
Regards.
From e584020d80f9f1e9878ca07b9df2a32a2d3e4492 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Carlier
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 11:08:15 +
Subject: [PATCH] DOC: deviceatlas: more exam
> If Haproxy doesn't terminate the encryption there is nothing you can do in
> any case.
> If it does, you can listen for the unencrypted traffic going between haproxy
> and the
> backend using tcpdump with appropriate filtering as well.
Also, if you for whatever reason need to decrypt the traff
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Ben Tisdall wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Ben Tisdall
> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Baptiste, will get on this today.
>>
>
> Ok this in the test environment now and the "other" counter now
> increments in step with "valid", eg:
>
> Resolvers section aws
>
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Baptiste wrote:
>
> Have you forced resolution to ipv4 only?
> if not, could you give it a try?
>
Right, with "resolver-prefer ipv4":
Resolvers section aws
nameserver aws_0:
sent: 11
valid: 11
update: 0
cname: 0
cname_error: 0
any_err: 0
nx: 0
t
I was not. Thanks for the info!
-Original Message-
From: Baptiste [mailto:bed...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2015 8:44 PM
To: Javier Torres
Cc: HAProxy
Subject: Re: HA Proxy - packet capture functionality
Hi Javier,
Are you aware of HAProxy logs and its termination states?
It s
Now, you can simply use whatever tool (ab, httperf, wrk, etc...)
hosted on a third party VM to inject traffic on ELB IP directly.
After a few minutes (less than 5), ELB service will be moved
automatically to an other instance, leading IP to change.
On HAProxy stat socket, you should see the 'update
http://lb.le-meilleur-de-la-mode.fr/r/?id=t2e58d1ac,206864e,20792bf&p1=haproxy@formilux.org&p2=haproxy@formilux.org
Signaler comme indésirable
Pour visualiser ce message au forma
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Baptiste wrote:
> Now, you can simply use whatever tool (ab, httperf, wrk, etc...)
> hosted on a third party VM to inject traffic on ELB IP directly.
> After a few minutes (less than 5), ELB service will be moved
> automatically to an other instance, leading IP to
Great, thanks for confirming!
Baptiste
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Ben Tisdall wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Baptiste wrote:
>> Now, you can simply use whatever tool (ab, httperf, wrk, etc...)
>> hosted on a third party VM to inject traffic on ELB IP directly.
>> After a few mi
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Baptiste wrote:
> Great, thanks for confirming!
>
Thanks for getting this sorted out Baptiste! Any idea of when the
fixes would be likely to be released and make it into the ppa?
--
Ben
Hi list,
I have got a complex "routing" problem and I am sure there is a solution with
haproxy but the ring doesn't bell. The problem in this case is that all users
of a customer have to work on the same application server (because of the data
broadcast feature of the java application framework
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 8:18 PM, Baptiste wrote:
> #2 an error in the way we parse CNAME responses, leading to return an
> error when validating a CNAME (this triggers bug #1).
How does your patch for this issue change the logic? It appears
functionally the same to me.
Jesse
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Jesse Hathaway wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 8:18 PM, Baptiste wrote:
>> #2 an error in the way we parse CNAME responses, leading to return an
>> error when validating a CNAME (this triggers bug #1).
>
> How does your patch for this issue change the logi
Sorry for being thickheaded, Willy, but what's your decision here — do you
want me to make it per-Backend instead of per-Server, or do you want to
merge it as-is?
I'm glad to defer completely to your judgement on this.
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Baptiste wrote:
>
> Ben, could you apply the patch below instead of 0001:
>
> [snip]
Sure, will report back in the morning. Thanks Jesse and Baptiste :)
Ben
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Ben Tisdall wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Baptiste wrote:
>>
>> Ben, could you apply the patch below instead of 0001:
>>
>> [snip]
That patch is proving problematic to apply, to save me guessing can
you provide it as an attachment please.
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Baptiste wrote:
> Good catch, forget about patch 1, It was 2AM in the morning when I
> wrote it :'(...
> I wanted to apply the same code as DNS_UPD_NO_IP_FOUND, and increment
> the OTHER error.
That is interesting, but I was asking about the second patch,
000
Op 28-10-2015 om 9:28 schreef Thierry FOURNIER:
Hi List,
I wrote a Lua advanced documentation. This explain the Lua integration
in HAProxy, the reason of some choices. Some traps and Lua code with
advanced comments.
This doc is not terminated, but I want to release a first version. I
will fill
Dear Baptiste, Ben and Jesse,
We have been facing the same issue that HAProxy backend is not able to
pull the right Web servers using our local DNS. We applied Baptiste’s
updated patches to server.c and dns.c and re-installed with a clean
make/make install. Still the same erroneous result.
H
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 6:39 PM, Ben Tisdall wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Ben Tisdall wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Baptiste wrote:
>>>
>>> Ben, could you apply the patch below instead of 0001:
>>>
>>> [snip]
>
> That patch is proving problematic to apply, to save me gu
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Jesse Hathaway wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Baptiste wrote:
>> Good catch, forget about patch 1, It was 2AM in the morning when I
>> wrote it :'(...
>> I wanted to apply the same code as DNS_UPD_NO_IP_FOUND, and increment
>> the OTHER error.
>
>
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Susheel Jalali
wrote:
> Dear Baptiste, Ben and Jesse,
>
> We have been facing the same issue that HAProxy backend is not able to
> pull the right Web servers using our local DNS. We applied Baptiste’s
> updated patches to server.c and dns.c and re-installed with a
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Roland RoLaNd wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to rate limit requests depending on their specific identifier
> which is sent either as a post header or a query string parameter.
>
> Below is my starting config (am i mistaken to be using this ? )
>
> stick-table t
http://lb.notre-reponse.fr/r/?id=t2e633589,207b6c6,207b4b1&p1=haproxy@formilux.org&p2=haproxy@formilux.org
Signaler comme indésirable
Pour visualiser ce message au format html,
30 matches
Mail list logo
