While at it use "You" instead of "They" as in the context
it seems to make more sense to refer to "you", as it is
you that are going to be running the command, there is no
"they".
Signed-off-by: Thiago Farina
---
CONTRIBUTING |4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --g
Hi,
there is a small bug in dumpstats.c, stats_dump_fields_csv(). One of the
writes is to the global `trash` chunk, which happens to be the right one,
but it should be to what gets passed in as argument (out).
Not even sure this was worth a patch, but it is attached if you like.
Otherwise, feel f
On 4/1/2016 4:25 AM, Baptiste wrote:
> Do you guys, on the ML, really need HTTP/2? If so what's your deadline??
Need? Perhaps not. Want? Very much so. Deadline: ASAP, but don't be
in a hurry. I definitely prefer to have a battle-tested solution that
takes a year than a lousy implementation d
Hi there -
Have you considered HAProxy in multiprocess mode? You could have a frontend
spread across multiple threads that terminates SSL. We're experimenting
with such a design here.
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 5:31 AM, Gerd Mueller
wrote:
> Ok sounds good. Thanks for the input.
>
> Gerd
>
> --
Hi Baptiste.
Am 01-04-2016 12:25, schrieb Baptiste:
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Aleksandar Lazic
wrote:
Hi Willy & other core devs/pms.
I know that HTTP/2 is on the road-map but not ready yet.
Would you be so kind and share some of your thoughts, stats and plans
for
HTTP/2.
Do you
Hi,
> Do you guys, on the ML, really need HTTP/2?
> If so what's your deadline??
Yea, we will definitively need it, our customers started asking about it two
months ago. Management will probably start to worry about pissing off premium
managed hosting customers if they keep asking and we can't ad
Ok sounds good. Thanks for the input.
Gerd
Weitergeleitete Nachricht
Von: Vincent Bernat
An: Conrad Hoffmann
Kopie: Gerd Mueller , haproxy@formilux.org
Betreff: Re: ssl offloading
Datum: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 11:29:16 +0200
❦ 1 avril 2016 11:11 +0200, Conrad Hoffmann :
>
> I
Hello Baptiste,
We have been asked questions about HTTP/2 but it does not seem to be a
block when we say its not fully supported in Layer7
Regards
Andrew Smalley
Loadbalancer.org
http://www.loadbalancer.org
On 1 April 2016 at 11:25, Baptiste wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Aleksan
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> Hi Willy & other core devs/pms.
>
> I know that HTTP/2 is on the road-map but not ready yet.
>
> Would you be so kind and share some of your thoughts, stats and plans for
> HTTP/2.
>
> Thank you very much.
>
> Best regards
> Aleks
>
Do y
Hi Willy & other core devs/pms.
I know that HTTP/2 is on the road-map but not ready yet.
Would you be so kind and share some of your thoughts, stats and plans
for HTTP/2.
Thank you very much.
Best regards
Aleks
> However, if I configure multiple listening sockets, to take advantage
> of SO_REUSEPORT (and that is exactly what I have on my production
> haproxy 1.5):
> bind :443 process 1 ssl alpn http/1.1 crt /etc/ssl/snakeoil.pem
> bind :443 process 2 ssl alpn http/1.1 crt /etc/ssl/snakeoil.pem
> bind :443
❦ 1 avril 2016 11:11 +0200, Conrad Hoffmann :
> I can't really back this up with reliable numbers, but a company I once
> worked for experimented with such hardware. The outcome was, and I would
> still always recommend this today, to rather throw more regular hardware at
> the problem. Modern
Hello,
I have Haproxy 1.5 in production with peers which synchronize properly.
I have been testing version 1.6, but can't get peers to synchronize.
As a template for my lab I used example from the official documentation
(https://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/configuration-1.6.html#3.5-peer).
I can't really back this up with reliable numbers, but a company I once
worked for experimented with such hardware. The outcome was, and I would
still always recommend this today, to rather throw more regular hardware at
the problem. Modern processors have a lot special instructions specifically
fo
We are experiencing 100% cpu load by this specific haproxy thread during huge
ssl load. With haproxy .4 we first used stunnel, than apache with mod_ssl. I
think haproxy with ssl performance much better than the other 2 but I am
thinking about offloading to a specific ssl device. Does anybody kno
15 matches
Mail list logo
