Re: haproxy 1.8 seems to be using wrong backend

Good Morning Lukas, Thank you! This was indeed the change which was necessary. Removed the ssl_fc_sni part in my ACLs, reactivated h2 and I’m back on track. Cheers (from a happy http2 user), Chris > Am 11.12.2017 um 23:48 schrieb Lukas Tribus : > > Hell Chris, > > >

Re[3]: Use haproxy 1.8.x to balance web applications only reachable through Internet proxy

Hi There is a simpler solution with delegate. I have run a squid on localhost 127.0.0.1:3128 I have run delegate with PROXY module delegate9.9.13$ src/delegated -f -vv -P127.0.0.1:8081 PROXY=127.0.0.1:3128 and now the swiss army knife curl was the haproxy simulator. echo 'GET

Re: Testing master-worker reloads on HAProxy 1.8

> > > Did you try launching a new haproxy process with the -sf option, without > > > using the master-worker? > > > > Yes, and that also failed with the same "cannot bind" error. > Without "expose-fd listeners" I suppose? That is correct. > Okay, so it looks like that the unbinding with SIGTOUT

Re: Testing master-worker reloads on HAProxy 1.8

On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 11:03:52PM +, Anthony Via wrote: > > Did you try the seamless reload using -x without the master-worker? > > I was looking into the "-x" option and it looks like simply adding "expose-fd > listeners" to my stats socket has fixed this issue for me. Sending SIGUSR2 to >

Re: Testing master-worker reloads on HAProxy 1.8

> Did you try the seamless reload using -x without the master-worker? I was looking into the "-x" option and it looks like simply adding "expose-fd listeners" to my stats socket has fixed this issue for me. Sending SIGUSR2 to the master process now works as expected. Is that option required for

Re: haproxy 1.8 seems to be using wrong backend

Hell Chris, 2017-12-11 20:04 GMT+01:00 Christian Bönning : > Hi, > > I recently switched from nginx to haproxy 1.8 for SSL termination and load > balancing in front of my application but saw an odd behaviour with "alpn > h2,http/1.1" enabled on my frontend. > >

Re: Incredible performance bump between 1.5.12 and 1.8.1 ?

On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 10:18 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Sat, Dec 09, 2017 at 10:10:25AM +0100, Pavlos Parissis wrote: >> On 09/12/2017 05:01 ?u, Christopher Lane wrote: >> > It is plausible/expected that my version upgrade performance goes like >> > (about 4K connections, >> >

Re[2]: Use haproxy 1.8.x to balance web applications only reachable through Internet proxy

Hi. -- Originalnachricht -- Von: "Moemen MHEDHBI" An: "Gbg" ; haproxy@formilux.org Gesendet: 11.12.2017 18:45:16 Betreff: Re: Use haproxy 1.8.x to balance web applications only reachable through Internet proxy On 11/12/2017 17:21, Gbg wrote:

haproxy 1.8 seems to be using wrong backend

Hi, I recently switched from nginx to haproxy 1.8 for SSL termination and load balancing in front of my application but saw an odd behaviour with "alpn h2,http/1.1" enabled on my frontend. I'm running a single haproxy instance in front of my applications switching between them based on

Re: Use haproxy 1.8.x to balance web applications only reachable through Internet proxy

On 11/12/2017 17:21, Gbg wrote: > Hello Moemen, > > unless I got this wrong this isn't the setup I search for. I don't > need haproxy to *be* a proxy but rather *use* a proxy while serving > content over http as a reverse proxy > > Perhaps I should have given the thread this name I get your

Re: Use haproxy 1.8.x to balance web applications only reachable through Internet proxy

Hello Moemen, unless I got this wrong this isn't the setup I search for. I don't need haproxy to *be* a proxy but rather *use* a proxy while serving content over http as a reverse proxy Perhaps I should have given the thread this name Am 11. Dezember 2017 16:56:12 MEZ schrieb Moemen MHEDHBI

Re: Use haproxy 1.8.x to balance web applications only reachable through Internet proxy

On 11/12/2017 15:02, Gbg wrote: > I need to contact applications through a socks or http proxy. > > My current setup looks like this but only works when the Computer > haproxy runs on has direct Internet connection (which is not the case > in our datacenter, I tried this at home) > > frontend

Re: [PATCH] BUG: NetScaler CIP handling is incorrect

Hi Andreas, I got this really side tracked, my apology. Let me take a look at that this evening again. Some corps need to be unburied. I'm afraid the patch, as is, will break compatibility with other version of the CIP protocol, I'd like haproxy to support both of them. Cheers, Bertrand On

Use haproxy 1.8.x to balance web applications only reachable through Internet proxy

I need to contact applications through a socks or http proxy. My current setup looks like this but only works when the Computer haproxy runs on has direct Internet connection (which is not the case in our datacenter, I tried this at home) frontend main bind *:8000 acl is_extweb1 path_beg -i

Re: Quick update on pending HTTP/2 issues

Hi Lukas, On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 11:54:07AM +0100, Lukas Tribus wrote: > Hello Willy, > > > > 2017-12-07 19:55 GMT+01:00 Willy Tarreau : > > Guys, > > > > just to warn you, there's currently an issue affecting HTTP/2 with POST > > payloads to "slow" servers. > > Ok, the POST

Re: Quick update on pending HTTP/2 issues

Hello Willy, 2017-12-07 19:55 GMT+01:00 Willy Tarreau : > Guys, > > just to warn you, there's currently an issue affecting HTTP/2 with POST > payloads to "slow" servers. Ok, the POST issue is obviously more important, but just to provide a complete picture we also have those 2