Re: v1.9.6+HEAD: segfault in h1_skip_chunk_crlf

Hi Christopher, On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 09:36:30PM +0200, Christopher Faulet wrote: > > It seems related to the last commits from Christopher Faulet, maybe > > around this commit: > > http://git.haproxy.org/?p=haproxy-1.9.git;a=commit;h=0c2973662163ab2753a54e729ecdb09dd694c2dd > > BUG/MINOR:

Re: [PATCH] FEATURE/MEDIUM: enable travis-ci builds

чт, 18 апр. 2019 г. в 21:51, Илья Шипицин : > > > чт, 18 апр. 2019 г. в 21:45, Willy Tarreau : > >> Hi Ilya, >> >> On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 01:06:11PM +0500, ??? wrote: >> > btw, we can run lua tests >> > >> > https://travis-ci.com/chipitsine/haproxy-1/builds/108641032 >> > >> > so... how

Re: v1.9.6+HEAD: segfault in h1_skip_chunk_crlf

Le 18/04/2019 à 16:55, William Dauchy a écrit : Hello, We are triggering a segfault on the last HEAD of haproxy-1.9 tree, last commit being 1e0fd266db3e503783ff623faabcb1dfe211cb89 BUG/MINOR: mworker: disable busy polling in the master process backtrace: Thread 1 (Thread 0x7f73aeffd700 (LWP

Re: [PR] IPv6: properly format an address coming from IPv6 socket as hex in lf_ip

Hi Lukas, On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 08:45:18PM +0200, Lukas Tribus wrote: > Hi Willy, > > > On Fri, 8 Mar 2019 at 14:23, PR Bot wrote: > > > > Dear list! > > > > Author: Radek Zajic > > Number of patches: 1 > > > > This is an automated relay of the Github pull request: > >IPv6: properly

Re: [PR] IPv6: properly format an address coming from IPv6 socket as hex in lf_ip

Hi Willy, On Fri, 8 Mar 2019 at 14:23, PR Bot wrote: > > Dear list! > > Author: Radek Zajic > Number of patches: 1 > > This is an automated relay of the Github pull request: >IPv6: properly format an address coming from IPv6 socket as hex in >lf_ip > > Patch title(s): >IPv6:

Re: [PATCH] wurfl device detection build fixes and dummy library

Hi Paul, On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 02:46:17PM +0200, Paul Stephen Borile wrote: > Hi All, Willy, > > please find attached to this email the 6 patches that cover various areas > of restyling of > the WURFL device detection feature for HAProxy. All patches can be back > ported to 1.9 if necessary. >

Re: [PATCH] FEATURE/MEDIUM: enable travis-ci builds

чт, 18 апр. 2019 г. в 21:45, Willy Tarreau : > Hi Ilya, > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 01:06:11PM +0500, ??? wrote: > > btw, we can run lua tests > > > > https://travis-ci.com/chipitsine/haproxy-1/builds/108641032 > > > > so... how do we want to run lua ? always enabled ? or two builds

Re: [PATCH] FEATURE/MEDIUM: enable travis-ci builds

Hi Ilya, On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 01:06:11PM +0500, ??? wrote: > btw, we can run lua tests > > https://travis-ci.com/chipitsine/haproxy-1/builds/108641032 > > so... how do we want to run lua ? always enabled ? or two builds (with and > without lua) ? I'd say that we generally detect

Re: Randomly high CPU usage

Hello Marco, On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 05:27:26PM +0200, Marco Corte wrote: > Hello! > > From time to time, about twice daily, and without any apparent reason, > haproxy jumps from using about 15% CPU usage to 100% (relative to the single > core it can use). > The situation becomes normal again

Randomly high CPU usage

Hello! From time to time, about twice daily, and without any apparent reason, haproxy jumps from using about 15% CPU usage to 100% (relative to the single core it can use). The situation becomes normal again after about 15-20 minutes. During one of these events, I was able to capture (see

v1.9.6+HEAD: segfault in h1_skip_chunk_crlf

Hello, We are triggering a segfault on the last HEAD of haproxy-1.9 tree, last commit being 1e0fd266db3e503783ff623faabcb1dfe211cb89 BUG/MINOR: mworker: disable busy polling in the master process backtrace: Thread 1 (Thread 0x7f73aeffd700 (LWP 13044)): #0 h1_skip_chunk_crlf (stop=0, start=0,

Re: QAT intermittent healthcheck errors

On 4/18/19 11:06 AM, Emeric Brun wrote: > Hi Marcin, > > On 4/12/19 6:10 PM, Marcin Deranek wrote: >> Hi Emeric, >> >> On 4/12/19 5:26 PM, Emeric Brun wrote: >> >>> Do you have ssl enabled on the server side? >> >> Yes, ssl is on frontend and backend with ssl checks enabled. >> >>> If it is the

[PATCH] wurfl device detection build fixes and dummy library

Hi All, Willy, please find attached to this email the 6 patches that cover various areas of restyling of the WURFL device detection feature for HAProxy. All patches can be back ported to 1.9 if necessary. Last patch is a dummy WURFL library that can be used to build/run haproxy compiled with the

Re: QAT intermittent healthcheck errors

Hi Marcin, On 4/12/19 6:10 PM, Marcin Deranek wrote: > Hi Emeric, > > On 4/12/19 5:26 PM, Emeric Brun wrote: > >> Do you have ssl enabled on the server side? > > Yes, ssl is on frontend and backend with ssl checks enabled. > >> If it is the case could replace health check with a simple tcp

[PATCH] http-request do-resolve

Hi all, Willy, Please find attached to this email the 4 patches for the http-request do-resolve action I submitted a few months ago. I integrated all feedback from Willy and also now support tcp-request content do-resolve. Baptiste From e96ff49ee05dbdc15dc7582349e6314dcfccb20e Mon Sep 17