Regards,
Bruno Henc
clock secs ( 1.74 usr 0.10 sys + 75.96
> cusr 9.72 csys = 87.52 CPU)
> Result: FAIL
> Makefile:207: recipe for target '_tests' failed
>
> What did you mean by thrown that test out? Now that test failed.
>
> Br,
>
> Jouni
>
> On 9/15/20 4:36 PM, Bruno Henc wrote:
&
Hi,
Last time I saw this error it involved TLS decryption by firewalls that didn't
support RSA-PSS. Why they blow up
when the new, more secure RSA-PSS signature algorithms are used beats me, but
it's principally _on them_ for not supporting the latest IETF standards.
Attached is a patch that
Corrected build instructions attached. openssl-2.2.2.2 should be haproxy-2.2.3.
Regards,
Bruno
apt-debuild
Description: Binary data
Hi,
> I take it that means theres no internal debug logging for the tls errors that
> we can just expose via logfile?
Proof of concept patches are attached with build instructions. You may wish to
edit the haproxy-2.2.3/rules/debian folder to increase the -j setting to your
current number of
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 6:57 PM, Kevin McArthur
wrote:
> Hi haproxy
>
> I'm wondering if there is any way to debug the error message "www-https/1:
> SSL handshake failure"? I've tried increasing log levels to debug etc, but
> nothing seems to log about
Hi Ionel,
Could you please try setting tune.bufsize 32768 in the global section?
(See the associated configuration manual entry for tune.bufsize for
a possible answer to both of your questions and for the memory-usage
implications).
Regards,
Bruno
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On
89a](https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/commit/1b8e68e89a)
Regards,
Bruno Henc
://www.haproxy.com/documentation/hapee/1-9r1/getting-started/os-hardware/
Please advise, thank you!
Regards
*LiJwee Eng*
Systems Engineer
*Dell Technologies**| *Data Protection Solutions
Mobile +65 97516931
lijwee@dell.com <mailto:lijwee@dell.com>**
--
Bruno Henc
Support Engineer
H
will reach out to you
with further information.
Regards,
On 7/11/19 3:15 PM, Austin Getz wrote:
Hello Team,
Can you please provide two quotes for the below for ETS?
--
Bruno Henc
Support Engineer
HAProxy Technologies
Hello Aleksandar,
The Common Log Format is defined as:
log-format "%{+Q}o %{-Q}ci - - [%trg] %r %ST %B \"\" \"\" %cp \ %ms %ft %b %s
%TR %Tw %Tc %Tr %Ta %tsc %ac %fc \ %bc %sc %rc %sq %bq %CC %CS %hrl %hsl"
The empty fields are expected if you haven't configured http request and
response
recommend checking out the performance section of the
configuration manual to help with capacity planning.
https://www.haproxy.com/documentation/hapee/1-8r2/onepage/#3.2
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Bruno Henc
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, March 27, 2019 8:39 PM, Robin Björklin
the instances to query all records
from the resolver.
Can you please retest with the updated configuration and report back the
results?
Best regards,
Bruno Henc
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, March 21, 2019 12:09 PM, Daniel Schneller
wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Friendly bump :)
> I'
details
like IPs, passwords etc.) and operating system version here, and the
estimated number of requests per second, I'll see if I can reproduce the
issue in a lab setting (and do the aforementioned bisecting).
Best regards,
Bruno Henc
On 3/13/19 2:08 PM, Mark Janssen wrote:
Hi,
I've recenly
rules.
For a more detailed overview of ACLs, check out this blog post:
https://www.haproxy.com/blog/introduction-to-haproxy-acls/
I do have to admit that including ACLs is a neat idea. Alternatively,
global ACLs would be nice.
Does this workaround solve your use case?
Best regards,
Bruno
a development version of HAProxy to take
advantage of the latest features.
Let me know if you get stuck.
Best regards,
Bruno Henc
On 2/19/19 9:45 PM, Joao Morais wrote:
Em 19 de fev de 2019, à(s) 05:57, Willy Tarreau escreveu:
In the past it was not possible
to dynamically create servers
I think
.
If I have any more information, I will try to share it as soon as possible.
Thank you for your patience and the detailed report on the issue you are
experiencing.
Best regards,
Bruno Henc
This looks like an interesting problem, though it is sad that
On 2/16/19 4:06 PM, Thomas Schmiedl wrote
performing A/B
testing (production, development, staging), the scale you are working
at, and which part of the stack you are A/B testing, it is difficult to
come up with a recommendation.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Best regards,
Bruno Henc
On 2/11/19 10:15 PM, James Root wrote:
Hi,
Another good explanation on what DPDK does is available here:
https://learning.oreilly.com/videos/oscon-2017/9781491976227/9781491976227-video306685
https://wiki.fd.io/images/1/1d/40_Gbps_IPsec_on_commodity_hardware.pdf
On 2/10/19 12:21 PM, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
Am 10.02.2019 um
Best regards,
Bruno Henc
On 1/21/19 11:40 PM, Joao Guimaraes wrote:
Hi Haproxy team!
I've been trying to figure out how to perform automatic redirects
based on source URL transformations.
*Basically I need the following redirect: *
mysite.*abc* redirected to *abc*.mysite.com <http://m
.
Best regards,
Bruno Henc
On 12/6/18 8:28 AM, Māra Grīnberga wrote:
Hi,
I'm new to Haproxy and I've a task for which I can't seem to find a
solution online. Probably, I'm not looking in the right places.
I need to check if a SOAP service responds before sending requests to
the server
-and-load-balancers/
how it can be implemented. For more information about proxy protocol
support in different software see also
https://www.haproxy.com/blog/haproxy/proxy-protocol/ .
Which smtp server are you using and which operating system are you
running it on?
Best regards,
Bruno Henc
to
decide if a server needs to be disabled or re-enabled.
Hope this helps.
Best regards,
Bruno Henc
On 11/13/18 9:27 AM, Jessy van Baal wrote:
Hi there!
Is there a way that HAProxy 1.8 can balance based on the network or
CPU load on the backend servers?
Let’s say, a backend server has 90
23 matches
Mail list logo
