Hi
I wanted to put a persistence cookie in the defaults section of my config,
but I ran into 2 problems on reloading HAproxy as a result:
- Every tcp backend in my config throws a warning like this: [WARNING]
185/153532 (25427) : config : 'cookie' statement ignored for proxy
On 10 February 2012 14:50, Sebastian Fohler i...@far-galaxy.de wrote:
What URL does haproxy use exactly to check the service?
Is it the realm + the url part or something else?
Just to be sure to test the correct option.
Hi Sebastian
If you are just using the check option for the backends,
On 10 February 2012 16:57, Baptiste bed...@gmail.com wrote:
Configure it like that:
option httpchk HEAD /index.php HTTP/1.0\r\nHost:\
www.domain.com
== please note the backslashes ( \ ) before the spaces.
You should use HTTP/1.1 if you're sending a Host: header.
Graeme.
On 31 January 2012 11:21, wsq003 wsq...@sina.com wrote:
Hi
Here we want haproxy to write logs to separate log files (i.e.
/home/admin/haproxy/var/logs/haproxy_20120131.log), and we want to rotate
the log files. Then cronolog seems to be a good candidate.
HAproxy can only log to a syslog
On 19 December 2011 16:37, MEßNER Arthur,Ing.Mag.
arthur.mess...@tilak.at wrote:
hello,
is there any method to do http to https redirection with variable Location
my configuration:
frontend someserver-clear
bind 10.16.246.9:80
acl clear dst_port 80
redirect
On 12 December 2011 11:18, Vincent Bernat ber...@luffy.cx wrote:
Hi!
When haproxy is bound to an IP address managed by VRRP, this IP address may
be absent when haproxy starts. What is the best way to handle this?
1. Start haproxy only when the host is master.
2. Use transparent mode.
3.
On 3 November 2011 21:34, Saul s...@extremecloudsolutions.com wrote:
My understanding was that multiple backends could use the same
interface, perhaps I was wrong, if that is the case, any suggestions
on how to be able to have multiple backends running tcp mode on port
443 so I can match the
On 24 October 2011 11:42, Iceskysl icesk...@gmail.com wrote:
I’m testing a new web server setup which is having a couple of issues.
Essentially, we have a web server, where the code uses the remote IP for
some interesting things, and also some apache directories secured down to
some certain
On 9 September 2011 13:49, John Helliwell john.helliw...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to have haproxy send requests to 4 backends which are redis
servers. Only one of the four is master, and the other 3 are slaves.
I want to health check by sending an INFO command, to which redis will reply
On 9 September 2011 14:44, John Helliwell john.helliw...@gmail.com wrote:
Indeed, the httchk is expecting a HTTP response header. I think I can fool
it by installing a wrapper script on the target which inserts a valid HTTP
response header - there is an example of that at
On 11 August 2011 16:16, Ran S r...@sheinberg.net wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to set up a binding to a Virtual IP in order to use master and
slave HAProxy load balancers.
I am following each of the two following guides:
On 3 August 2011 17:56, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 11:41:03AM -0400, Guillaume Bourque wrote:
Hi all,
So to answer the secific question from what I have seen as soon as
you use option
http-server-close
In the apache or any backend log you will only
Hi
I've been looking at decreasing page load times, and as part of this I'm
revisiting a decision that was made when we started using HAproxy back in
the 1.3.x era. At the time, HAproxy had no support for HTTP keep-alive, and
we needed to use option forwardfor. As a result, we added option
Hi
Using HAproxy 1.4.8.
One of our applications generates an HTTP 302 redirect with a really
long Location. In one instance I've looked at, the Location: header is
8,175 bytes. If we bypass HAproxy, the browser happily goes to the
returned URL, if we instead go via HAproxy, the 302 is turned
On 19 July 2011 21:55, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 11:06:58AM -0700, carlo wrote:
Check out tune.bufsize and tune.maxrewrite in the Performance Tuning section
of the HAProxy docs.
Indeed. I would add something : an application which generates headers or
URLs that
On 9 June 2011 00:05, Jacob Fenwick jacob.fenw...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems like I must be root to start haproxy.
I know that I can add a user line in global so that the process will change
to say it is running as a non-root user once it is running, but it seems
like I still need to be root
Hi all
Has anyone else noticed instances of messages sent to the list not being
delivered?
I just realised that a reply I sent to Kyle's question 2 days ago never made
it to the list. Notice that until now there are no messages from me to the
list shown on
On 8 February 2011 14:48, Kyle Brandt k...@stackoverflow.com wrote:
Can I have an ACL that doesn't perform an action on a specific IP but will
perform the action on the subnet that the IP is part of?
For example:
acl bad_subnet src 10.0.0.0/8
acl okay_ip src 10.0.1.5
use_backend blocked
Hi
HAproxy 1.4.8.
If I look at the stats page, on one of my backends I'm seeing these values
under the warning column: retr (344) and redis (172). The backend has 8
servers and only 1 has non-zero values for this column.
Can someone explain what the numbers mean, I've tried poking through the
On 15 November 2010 21:09, Maxime Ducharme m...@techboom.com wrote:
Hi guys
We are looking for a way to get real source IP that is connecting to our
web services.
We currently use option forwardfor, but some people are using this to
bypass our checks.
Is there other way to send real IP
Hi Joe
Yes, it is possible, but there's a little more work involved than just
applying the patch to stunnel.
Firstly, you need to specify in your stunnel.conf that you want stunnel to
add the X-Forwarded-For header:
[https]
accept = 1.2.3.4:443
connect = 1.2.3.4:80
TIMEOUTclose = 0
Hi
This is not currently possible. DNS queries use UDP as the transport in the
vast majority of cases. TCP is rarely used. HAproxy does not do UDP load
balancing. This was discussed on the list a while ago.
See here for more info:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domain_Name_System#Protocol_details
Hi Julien
While you could do this with multiple ACLs or a regex, there is a third
option which is even better: use the hdr_end() function instead of hdr().
From the doc (http://haproxy.1wt.eu/download/1.4/doc/configuration.txt, see
section 7.5.3. Matching at Layer 7):
-8-
hdr_end string
test2.cluster6.corp.amiestreet.com:80 cookie B check inter
2s
and it's sending the correct headers, at least for test1. The problem is
that it's also sending Host: test1... to test2. I don't see how to
configure it to send each host the correct header.
On Aug 17, 2010, at 5:23 PM, Graeme
Hi Roy
You simply need to send an HTTP 1.1 request with a Host: header in the http
check, like this:
option httpchk GET /index.html\r\nHost: vhost.example.com
Graeme.
On 17 August 2010 23:19, Roy Smith r...@panix.com wrote:
I'm running HA-Proxy version 1.3.22 on Ubuntu Linux. I've got
Hi
What you are trying to achieve is usually called link aggregation or line
bonding. This has nothing to do with the load balancing functionality
provided by HAProxy.
Try these links for more information:
http://www.google.com/search?q=adsl+bonding
Hi
I'm playing around with something like this:
acl src_goaway src 10.0.0.1
redirect location http://example.com/goaway.html
I have seen examples in the docs where src is specified as multiple IPs in a
single ACL, but I don't see any mention of how many IPs can be in a single
ACL.
Did I miss
27 matches
Mail list logo
