Re: 'show table' is unreliable?

2016-03-11 Thread Robert Samuel Newson
On 11 Mar 2016, at 22:43, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > Robert, > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 10:36:14PM +, Robert Samuel Newson wrote: >> yep, I bound everything but I still get warnings. There's a bug that might be >> related where binding stats doesn't work with stats bind-process, perhaps >> th

Re: 'show table' is unreliable?

2016-03-11 Thread Willy Tarreau
Robert, On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 10:36:14PM +, Robert Samuel Newson wrote: > yep, I bound everything but I still get warnings. There's a bug that might be > related where binding stats doesn't work with stats bind-process, perhaps > that's my problem? Chad is right to insist on this, because C

Re: 'show table' is unreliable?

2016-03-11 Thread Robert Samuel Newson
ok, I'll try that, and looking forward to a 1.6.4, quite a few good fixes since 1.6.3. B. > On 11 Mar 2016, at 22:39, Cyril Bonté wrote: > > Hi, > > Le 11/03/2016 23:36, Robert Samuel Newson a écrit : >> yep, I bound everything but I still get warnings. There's a bug that might >> be related

Re: 'show table' is unreliable?

2016-03-11 Thread Cyril Bonté
Hi, Le 11/03/2016 23:36, Robert Samuel Newson a écrit : yep, I bound everything but I still get warnings. There's a bug that might be related where binding stats doesn't work with stats bind-process, perhaps that's my problem? Yes, there was a bug that will be fixed in next releases, which s

Re: 'show table' is unreliable?

2016-03-11 Thread Robert Samuel Newson
yep, I bound everything but I still get warnings. There's a bug that might be related where binding stats doesn't work with stats bind-process, perhaps that's my problem? > On 11 Mar 2016, at 22:33, Chad Lavoie wrote: > > Greetings, > > Ah, is the stats socket also bound to one process? For

Re: 'show table' is unreliable?

2016-03-11 Thread Chad Lavoie
Greetings, Ah, is the stats socket also bound to one process? For example "stats socket /var/run/haproxy.sock mode 0600 level admin process 4" to bind it to process 4. Otherwise the process your querying for the stats will bounce around, even if the process with the table doesn't. - Chad

Re: 'show table' is unreliable?

2016-03-11 Thread Robert Samuel Newson
ah, yes, nbproc of 2 here, but I should be clear. The stick tables are in a proxy pinned to one single process, the other is used to handle TLS decoding. > On 11 Mar 2016, at 18:27, Chad Lavoie wrote: > > Greetings, > > That should have been "Do you have nbproc set and more then 1?", sorry. >

Re: 'show table' is unreliable?

2016-03-11 Thread Chad Lavoie
Greetings, That should have been "Do you have nbproc set and more then 1?", sorry. - Chad On 03/11/2016 01:17 PM, Chad Lavoie wrote: Greetings, Do you have nbproc set or more then 1? If so, then each thread has its own stick table set; and depending on what thread handles it the values will

Re: 'show table' is unreliable?

2016-03-11 Thread Chad Lavoie
Greetings, Do you have nbproc set or more then 1? If so, then each thread has its own stick table set; and depending on what thread handles it the values will differ. Individual frontends can be set to a specific thread with bind-process (or for SSL a frontend specifically for SSL terminatio

'show table' is unreliable?

2016-03-11 Thread Robert Samuel Newson
Hi, I'm using haproxy 1.6.3 and think I've uncovered an issue. I use the stick table feature and as you can see from below, items appear and disappear randomly, these samples were taken less than a second apart. Obviously the items in the middle have at least 56 seconds remaining before expira