On 1 April 2013 23:49, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Great. I'm planning a dev18 release for tomorrow afternoon, tell me
> if you want me to wait a bit more.
>
> Thanks,
> Willy
>
It will be ready before the afternoon so that you can get it in dev18!
Thanks
On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 11:38:00PM +0200, Marc-Antoine Perennou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After checking out the man page of waitpid, wait would indeed be sufficient
> here.
> I didn't actually know about waitpid(-1)
>
> I'll resubmit an updated patch tomorrow!
Great. I'm planning a dev18 release for tom
Hi,
After checking out the man page of waitpid, wait would indeed be sufficient
here.
I didn't actually know about waitpid(-1)
I'll resubmit an updated patch tomorrow!
Thanks
On 1 April 2013 23:32, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Marc-Antoine,
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 02:50:56PM +0100, Marc-An
Hi Marc-Antoine,
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 02:50:56PM +0100, Marc-Antoine Perennou wrote:
> Formerly, if A was replaced by B, and then B by C before
> A finished exiting, we didn't wait for B to finish so it
> ended up as a zombie process.
> Fix this by queuing all process we spawn for waitpid.
I'm
Formerly, if A was replaced by B, and then B by C before
A finished exiting, we didn't wait for B to finish so it
ended up as a zombie process.
Fix this by queuing all process we spawn for waitpid.
Signed-off-by: Marc-Antoine Perennou
---
src/haproxy-systemd-wrapper.c | 45 ++
5 matches
Mail list logo
