[RFC PATCH 0/8] URI normalization / Issue #714

2021-04-08 Thread Tim Duesterhus
Willy, Christopher, Not sure who of you is better suited to review this series, so I'm adding both of you :-) I'm tagging this as RFC, because it's large and quite a bit outside of my comfort zone. However the patches are as clean as possible. They include full documentation and each normalizer c

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] URI normalization / Issue #714

2021-04-09 Thread Christopher Faulet
Le 08/04/2021 à 20:59, Tim Duesterhus a écrit : Willy, Christopher, Not sure who of you is better suited to review this series, so I'm adding both of you :-) I'm tagging this as RFC, because it's large and quite a bit outside of my comfort zone. However the patches are as clean as possible. The

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] URI normalization / Issue #714

2021-04-13 Thread Christopher Faulet
Le 08/04/2021 à 20:59, Tim Duesterhus a écrit : Willy, Christopher, Not sure who of you is better suited to review this series, so I'm adding both of you :-) I'm tagging this as RFC, because it's large and quite a bit outside of my comfort zone. However the patches are as clean as possible. The

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] URI normalization / Issue #714

2021-04-13 Thread Tim Düsterhus
Christopher, On 4/13/21 2:41 PM, Christopher Faulet wrote: Sorry for the delay. I'll comment your patches by replying inline when No delay experienced. You said that you'd try this week and it's still this week. So this is fine :-) appropriate. The quality of the whole series is pretty good

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] URI normalization / Issue #714

2021-04-13 Thread Christopher Faulet
Le 13/04/2021 à 17:45, Tim Düsterhus a écrit : Christopher, On 4/13/21 2:41 PM, Christopher Faulet wrote: Sorry for the delay. I'll comment your patches by replying inline when No delay experienced. You said that you'd try this week and it's still this week. So this is fine :-) appropriate.