Hi.
Resuscitate this old thread with a musl lib update.
https://musl.libc.org/releases.html
```
musl-1.2.4.tar.gz (sig) - May 1, 2023
This release adds TCP fallback to the DNS stub resolver, fixing the
longstanding inability to query large DNS records and incompatibility
with recursive n
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 05:38:59PM +0500, ??? wrote:
> ??, 16 ???. 2020 ?. ? 16:26, Willy Tarreau :
>
> > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 12:29:42PM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> > > > FWIW musl seems to work OK here when building for linux-glibc-legacy.
> > >
> > > Yes. HAProxy linked against Mu
чт, 16 апр. 2020 г. в 16:26, Willy Tarreau :
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 12:29:42PM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> > > FWIW musl seems to work OK here when building for linux-glibc-legacy.
> >
> > Yes. HAProxy linked against Musl is smoke tested as part of the Docker
> > Official Images program, beca
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 12:29:42PM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> > FWIW musl seems to work OK here when building for linux-glibc-legacy.
>
> Yes. HAProxy linked against Musl is smoke tested as part of the Docker
> Official Images program, because the Alpine-based Docker images use Musl
> as their
On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 12:37:44PM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Ilya,
>
> Am 16.04.20 um 12:34 schrieb ???:
> > yep, I thought about alpine as well.
> >
> > I'm not sure how often official docker validation runs. If it runs often
> > enough, maybe we do not need CI.
> >
>
> The tests
Ilya,
Am 16.04.20 um 12:34 schrieb Илья Шипицин:
> yep, I thought about alpine as well.
>
> I'm not sure how often official docker validation runs. If it runs often
> enough, maybe we do not need CI.
>
The tests are run for every update of the Dockerfile, thus either for
new HAProxy releases or
yep, I thought about alpine as well.
I'm not sure how often official docker validation runs. If it runs often
enough, maybe we do not need CI.
чт, 16 апр. 2020 г. в 15:29, Tim Düsterhus :
> Willy,
>
> [removed Bindushree from Cc as we disgress from the main topic]
>
> Am 16.04.20 um 11:44 schrie
Willy,
[removed Bindushree from Cc as we disgress from the main topic]
Am 16.04.20 um 11:44 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
>> seems, we need some musl or picolibc in CI.
>> beeing glibc dependent is dangerous
>
> It's not really glibc-dependent in that it's properly enclosed in ifdefs.
> But you'd be we
8 matches
Mail list logo
