On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Pavlos Parissis
wrote:
>
>
> On 16/07/2015 04:02 μμ, Krishna Kumar (Engineering) wrote:
>> Hi John,
>>
>> Your suggestion works very well, and exactly what I was looking for.
>> Thank you very much.
>>
>
>
> You could also try https://github.com/unixsurfer/haproxy
Thanks Pavlos, this looks very promising, I will take a look on how we
can use this.
Regards,
- Krishna Kumar
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 8:36 PM, Pavlos Parissis
wrote:
>
>
> On 16/07/2015 04:02 μμ, Krishna Kumar (Engineering) wrote:
> > Hi John,
> >
> > Your suggestion works very well, and exactl
On 16/07/2015 04:02 μμ, Krishna Kumar (Engineering) wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Your suggestion works very well, and exactly what I was looking for.
> Thank you very much.
>
You could also try https://github.com/unixsurfer/haproxytool
Cheers,
Pavlos
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital s
Hi John,
Your suggestion works very well, and exactly what I was looking for.
Thank you very much.
Regards,
- Krishna Kumar
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 5:48 PM, John Skarbek wrote:
> Krishna,
>
> I've recently had to deal with this as well. Our solution involves a
> couple of aspects. Firstly,
Krishna,
I've recently had to deal with this as well. Our solution involves a
couple of aspects. Firstly, one must configure an admin socket per
process. In our case we run with 20 processes, so we've got a
configuration that looks similar to this in our global section:
stats socket /var/run
Hi all,
We have a large set of machines running haproxy (1.5.12), and each of
them have hundreds of backends, many of which are the same across
systems. nbproc is set to 12 at present for our 48 core systems. We are
planning a centralized health check, and disable the same in haproxy, to
avoid eac
6 matches
Mail list logo
