Hi Marshall,
Le 07/03/2016 16:56, Marshall, Owen (GE Appliances) a écrit :
Hi there,
I'm seeing some odd behavior with HAProxy 1.6.3 and the ordering of ssl &
verify in my configuration file. I'm not sure if this is truly a bug or a
misunderstanding on my part.
We are attempting to set up
Hi there,
I'm seeing some odd behavior with HAProxy 1.6.3 and the ordering of ssl &
verify in my configuration file. I'm not sure if this is truly a bug or a
misunderstanding on my part.
We are attempting to set up HAProxy to load balance SSL-enabled servers, but
aren't currently concerned
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 10:07 AM, Krishna Kumar (Engineering)
krishna...@flipkart.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am having the following problem with SSL + large I/O. Details are:
Distribution: Debian 7, Kernel: 3.19.6, ab version: 2.3, haproxy: 1.5.12,
nginx: 1.2.1
$ ab -k -n 10 -c 100
Hi Baptiste,
Thank you very much for the tips. I have nbproc=8 in my configuration. Made
the
following changes:
Added both bind and tune.bufsize changeresult -
works.
Removed the tune.bufsize
result - works.
Added bind-process for frontend and backend as:
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Krishna Kumar (Engineering)
krishna...@flipkart.com wrote:
Hi Baptiste,
Thank you very much for the tips. I have nbproc=8 in my configuration. Made
the
following changes:
Added both bind and tune.bufsize changeresult -
works.
Thanks Baptiste.
The performance for SSL vs regular is very bad. Could someone help
with that? Following is the configuration, test result and the monitoring
tool results (the last is interesting).
- Configuration file -
global
daemon
maxconn
Hi all,
I am having the following problem with SSL + large I/O. Details are:
Distribution: Debian 7, Kernel: 3.19.6, ab version: 2.3, haproxy: 1.5.12,
nginx: 1.2.1
$ ab -k -n 10 -c 100 http://IP:80/128K
Works correctly.
$ ab -k -n 1 -c 10 https://IP:443/4K
Works correctly.
$ ab -k -n
]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. September 2014 07:32
An: Andreas Mock
Cc: haproxy
Betreff: Re: [ADDENDUM] Performance issue with SSL and keep alive, weird
result of ab test
Hi Andreas,
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 03:05:36PM +, Andreas Mock wrote:
Hi all,
I did the ab test with concurrency
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 08:32:05AM +, Andreas Mock wrote:
Hi Willy,
thank you for your answer.
Do you have an explanation for the fact that
ab keep-alive without SSL seems to work correct but
as soon as SSL is enabled performance degrades as
shown?
Unfortunately no, I have no
: Re: [ADDENDUM] Performance issue with SSL and keep alive, weird
result of ab test
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 08:32:05AM +, Andreas Mock wrote:
Hi Willy,
thank you for your answer.
Do you have an explanation for the fact that
ab keep-alive without SSL seems to work correct
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 09:21:21AM +, Andreas Mock wrote:
Hi Willy,
which trace would help?
On the server side?
Do you mean a TCP dump or which trace do you think of?
Yes, a tcpdump with full packets on the server side (clear text) so that
we know whether the response is compatible with
Hi all,
I'm just doing some performance test on a ha-proxy 1.5.4
and 'ab' on the client side:
* http = OK
* https = OK
* https + Keep-Alive = NOT OK (really bad performance)
Can someone explain this result to me. What did I miss?
Here the relevant config:
[mailto:andreas.m...@drumedar.de]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 9. September 2014 16:34
An: haproxy
Betreff: Performance issue with SSL and keep alive, weird result of ab test
Hi all,
I'm just doing some performance test on a ha-proxy 1.5.4
and 'ab' on the client side:
* http = OK
* https = OK
* https
Hi Andreas,
On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 03:05:36PM +, Andreas Mock wrote:
Hi all,
I did the ab test with concurrency = 1 and keep-alive.
I found the following log entries written by HAProxy.
Sep 9 16:54:20 server haproxy[29183]: :60646
[09/Sep/2014:16:54:20.014] fe_ssl_static~
I just installed haproxy and it was working fine for two days now. Now, I'll
be implementing SSL on my backend server so here I go again.
I have configured haproxy and it has cookie enabled to retain sessions since
there is authentication involved in the web services. However, it seems it
was not
I'm now looking into stunnel + haproxy.
This is a dumb question for a gnubie like me.
How do I patch stunnel-4.22-xforwarded-for.diff? I have unpack stunnel-4.20.
Change to that directory and do the command patch ../stunnel4.20.patch.
The context of stunnel4.20.patch was
16 matches
Mail list logo