RE: Keep-alive and websocket connections

2014-02-07 Thread Lukas Tribus
Hi, > Thanks for your suggestion, Lukas. > > For my own understanding, are you saying that there is no difference > between having "http-keep-alive" and having "http-server-close" to a > backend server once websocket connection to that server is establish, > and both settings allow for establishi

Re: Keep-alive and websocket connections

2014-02-06 Thread Chris Yang
Thanks for your suggestion, Lukas. For my own understanding, are you saying that there is no difference between having "http-keep-alive" and having "http-server-close" to a backend server once websocket connection to that server is establish, and both settings allow for establishing websocket conn

RE: Keep-alive and websocket connections

2014-02-06 Thread Lukas Tribus
Hi, > In the latest HAProxy 1.5 release (dev22), it is indicated that > keep-alive is now enabled by default for both client and server sides. > I have some questions regarding its use in the following scenario. > > I use HAProxy in front of an array of servers: one nginx for > delivering static

Keep-alive and websocket connections

2014-02-06 Thread Chris Yang
Dear all, In the latest HAProxy 1.5 release (dev22), it is indicated that keep-alive is now enabled by default for both client and server sides. I have some questions regarding its use in the following scenario. I use HAProxy in front of an array of servers: one nginx for delivering static files,