On 9/25/2012 3:58 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:26:53PM +0200, Baptiste wrote:
1.5-dev branch may be broken because it is the development branch
version. For example, dev12 is broken on SSL if no SNI is sent (there
may be other bugs).
I would add that a number of people do
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:26:53PM +0200, Baptiste wrote:
> > I looked into upgrading recently to a
> > newer dev snapshot, but I see that the download section says "may be broken"
> > for 1.5dev12. How is it broken? Would I be OK running 1.5dev12 as a front
> > end for Solr servers?
> >
>
> H
> I looked into upgrading recently to a
> newer dev snapshot, but I see that the download section says "may be broken"
> for 1.5dev12. How is it broken? Would I be OK running 1.5dev12 as a front
> end for Solr servers?
>
Hi,
1.5-dev branch may be broken because it is the development branch
ve
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> I have a need to cause haproxy to match an ACL when a header (User-Agent)
> is missing. Can that be written with the configuration language in its
> current state? I'm running 1.4.18 here.
>
How about
acl has_useragent hdr_c
I have a need to cause haproxy to match an ACL when a header
(User-Agent) is missing. Can that be written with the configuration
language in its current state? I'm running 1.4.18 here.
In another installation, I am running 1.5.dev7, modified with a BUFSIZE
of 65536 because we have some reall
5 matches
Mail list logo