Patch proposal for FEATURE/MAJOR: Add upstream-proxy-tunnel feature (was: Re: Maybe stupid question but can HAProxy now use a upstream proxy)

Hi. I have done some progress with the feature :-) The test setup runs in 4 shells. # shell1: curl -vk --connect-to www.test1.com:4433:127.0.0.1:8080 -H "Host: www.test1.com" https://www.test1.com:4433 # shell2: ./haproxy -d -f examples/upstream-proxy.cfg # shell3: sudo podman run --rm -it --

Re: Maybe stupid question but can HAProxy now use a upstream proxy

Hi. I have seen https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/issues/1542 which requests that feature. Now I have tried to "port" the https://github.com/brentcetinich/haproxy/commit/bc258bff030677d855a6a84fec881398e8f1e082 to the current dev branch and attached the patch. I'm pretty sure that there a

Maybe stupid question but can HAProxy now use a upstream proxy

Hi. I follow the development more or less closely and I must say I not always understand all changes :-). Just for my clarification is the following setup now possible with HAProxy with all the new shiny features :-) client => frontend | \-> backend server dest1