I personally find it easier to use cookie instead of appsession. We use a
similar pattern of adding a new server. Keeping a low maxidle (like 10
minutes) helps us send traffic to new servers. Keeping maxidle helps us
maintain session affinity where required (like progress bars for uploads)
Vivek
session through socket command?
/E
From: Vivek Malik [mailto:vivek.ma...@gmail.com]
Sent: den 7 november 2011 11:05
To: Erik Torlen
Cc: haproxy@formilux.org
Subject: Re: Autoscaling in haproxy with persistence sessions
I personally find it easier to use cookie instead of appsession. We use a
similar
?
/E
From: Erik Torlen [mailto:erik.tor...@apicasystem.com]
Sent: den 7 november 2011 11:16
To: Vivek Malik
Cc: haproxy@formilux.org
Subject: RE: Autoscaling in haproxy with persistence sessions
Interesting. In this case we are expecting a lot of burst traffic during a very
short period of time, 15
re appsession in
> a stick-table and clear the session through socket command?
>
>
>
> /E
>
>
>
> From: Vivek Malik [mailto:vivek.ma...@gmail.com]
> Sent: den 7 november 2011 11:05
> To: Erik Torlen
> Cc: haproxy@formilux.org
> Subject: Re: Autoscaling i
Malik;
haproxy@formilux.org
Subject: Re: Autoscaling in haproxy with persistence sessions
This sounds like what balancing on a hashed value is intended for.
'hash-type consistent' will reduce the redistribution of keys when the
pool is expanded, and when nodes are removed, only t
sage-
From: David Birdsong [mailto:david.birds...@gmail.com]
Sent: den 7 november 2011 12:18
To: Erik Torlen
Cc: Vivek Malik; haproxy@formilux.org
Subject: Re: Autoscaling in haproxy with persistence sessions
This sounds like what balancing on a hashed value is intended for.
'hash-type consistent
...@gmail.com]
Sent: den 7 november 2011 12:27
To: David Birdsong; Erik Torlen
Cc: haproxy@formilux.org
Subject: Re: Autoscaling in haproxy with persistence sessions
If the solution is intended for traffic burst, Isn't it safe to assume that
most clients will be new which appsession/cookie doesn&#
rs.
>
> /E
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: vivek.ma...@gmail.com [mailto:vivek.ma...@gmail.com]
> Sent: den 7 november 2011 12:27
> To: David Birdsong; Erik Torlen
> Cc: haproxy@formilux.org
> Subject: Re: Autoscaling in haproxy with persistence sessions
>
&g
On 2011-11-07 21:32, Erik Torlen wrote:
> If you get a burst against 3 active backend servers they will take
> care of all the request and connections. The clients that are active
> will then get a persistence sessions against 1 of these 3 servers. It
> will take ~5min to scale up a new server so
:43
To: Erik Torlen
Cc: vivek.ma...@gmail.com; David Birdsong; haproxy@formilux.org
Subject: Re: Autoscaling in haproxy with persistence sessions
Hi Erik,
Let me give you a few information, I don't know if it will help.
Appsession is not resilient on HAProxy reload.
Which means that since you r
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:48 PM, Erik Torlen wrote:
> Thank you Baptiste, seems like it should work then out-of-the-box when using
> appsession.
>
> On Haproxy reload the sessions should be cleared and then clients would be
> replicated to new servers.
>
Actually, the weakness of appsession seem
> plus new servers.
>
> /E
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: vivek.ma...@gmail.com [mailto:vivek.ma...@gmail.com]
> Sent: den 7 november 2011 12:27
> To: David Birdsong; Erik Torlen
> Cc: haproxy@formilux.org
> Subject: Re: Autoscaling in haproxy with persiste
ubject: Re: Autoscaling in haproxy with persistence sessions
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:48 PM, Erik Torlen wrote:
> Thank you Baptiste, seems like it should work then out-of-the-box when using
> appsession.
>
> On Haproxy reload the sessions should be cleared and then clients would be
>
never know, big releases going mainstream tends to
generate traffic so we need to make sure that
scaling further up will work as expected.
/E
-Original Message-
From: Holger Just [mailto:hapr...@meine-er.de]
Sent: den 7 november 2011 12:45
To: haproxy@formilux.org
Subject: Re: Autoscali
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Erik Torlen
wrote:
> What would you recommend if we wanted to have all our three haproxy instances
> loadbalance in the same way.
> And still make use of persistence when the client is using one of the haproxy
> instances?
>
> E.g Having the client come to the sa
h-type map-based
/E
-Original Message-
From: Baptiste [mailto:bed...@gmail.com]
Sent: den 7 november 2011 13:58
To: Erik Torlen
Cc: vivek.ma...@gmail.com; David Birdsong; haproxy@formilux.org
Subject: Re: Autoscaling in haproxy with persistence sessions
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:05 PM
16 matches
Mail list logo
