On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 08:50:34 -0500, "John Lauro"
wrote:
> 1. In addition to mode tcp, you would also have to use transparent
> mode in haproxy instead of having a firewall forward it to haproxy
> (unless by firewall, he was planning on running tproxy mode on the
> same box), otherwise the destinati
have full logging in the firewall that
forwards to haproxy... and can easily merge the two logs...
From: XANi [mailto:xani...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 8:30 AM
To: John Lauro
Cc: 'Dave'; haproxy@formilux.org
Subject: Re: Using HAProxy In Place of WCCP
On Wed, 4 No
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 06:58:32 -0500, "John Lauro"
wrote:
> I see two potential issues (which may or may not be important for
> you).
>
>
>
> 1. Non http 1.1 clients may have trouble (ie: they don't send
> the host on the URL request, or if they are not really http but using
> port 80).
Yea
I see two potential issues (which may or may not be important for you).
1. Non http 1.1 clients may have trouble (ie: they don't send the host
on the URL request, or if they are not really http but using port 80).
2. Back tracking if you get a complaint from some website (ie: RIAA
4 matches
Mail list logo
