On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:36:12AM +0200, Michiel van Es wrote:
> >Don't look blindly at the tools you're using, but choose the tools you
> >need based on the goal you're trying to reach. Ah, who am I kidding, I'm
> >just an IT-nerd wanting to play with cool balancers as well..
>
> That is the who
Original Message
Subject: Re: question about transparancy
From: Angelo Höngens
To: haproxy@formilux.org
Date: 04/23/2010 11:31 AM
On 23-4-2010 11:19, Michiel van Es wrote:
Angelo Höngens wrote:
On 22-4-2010 20:28, Michiel van Es wrote:
Yes
That is the default smtp
On 23-4-2010 11:19, Michiel van Es wrote:
>
>
> Angelo Höngens wrote:
>> On 22-4-2010 20:28, Michiel van Es wrote:
>>> Yes
>>> That is the default smtp failover setup but I want to balance the load
>>> via a load balancer setup
>>> Mx records can not balance load
>>
>> If you have 2 mx records wi
Angelo Höngens wrote:
On 22-4-2010 20:28, Michiel van Es wrote:
Yes
That is the default smtp failover setup but I want to balance the load
via a load balancer setup
Mx records can not balance load
If you have 2 mx records with the same priority, your load should be
balanced..
Or you could h
On 22-4-2010 20:28, Michiel van Es wrote:
> Yes
> That is the default smtp failover setup but I want to balance the load
> via a load balancer setup
> Mx records can not balance load
If you have 2 mx records with the same priority, your load should be
balanced..
Or you could have a single mx re
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 09:47:51PM +0200, Michiel van Es wrote:
> Hmm, I found out that it is not supported for mode tcp:
>
> Starting HAproxy: [WARNING] 111/213701 (5089) : config : 'option
> forwardfor' ignored for proxy 'load_balanced_smtp' as it requires HTTP mode.
>
Hmm, I found out that it is not supported for mode tcp:
Starting HAproxy: [WARNING] 111/213701 (5089) : config : 'option
forwardfor' ignored for proxy 'load_balanced_smtp' as it requires HTTP mode.
[ OK ]
Is this possible for the mod
I am running ASSP on the mailservers, since 1.6.2 ASSP understands
headres like x-forward-for :
- Text to Identify Originating IP Header* (OriginatingIP)
If ASSP runs behind another server(s), no IP/HELO based filter will
work. If a special header with the originating IP is inserted from the
f
Yes
That is the default smtp failover setup but I want to balance the load
via a load balancer setup
Mx records can not balance load
Regards
Michiel van Es
Op 22 apr 2010 om 19:06 heeft Guillaume Bourque > het volgende geschreven:\
Hi,
Why dont you use 2 MX record with the same weight
A
Hi,
Why dont you use 2 MX record with the same weight
All email will come in to youre 2 servers.
Just my 2¢
Bye
Michiel van Es a écrit :
Hi,
I am running 2 mailservers with ASSP as a spam proxy.
I use haproxy to load balance between the 2 mailservers.
The problem is that the spam filter is
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Michiel van Es [mailto:m...@pcintelligence.nl]
> Envoyé : jeudi 22 avril 2010 18:11
> À : Chris Sarginson
> Cc : haproxy@formilux.org
> Objet : Re: question about transparancy
>
>
>
> On 4/22/10 6:03 PM, Chris Sargin
On 4/22/10 6:03 PM, Chris Sarginson wrote:
Michiel van Es wrote:
I read this archive from 2008:
http://www.formilux.org/archives/haproxy/0801/0507.html
But the problem is that I can not recompile the kernel :(
Isn't there any other way like the x-forward-for header to make this
work?
As th
Michiel van Es wrote:
I read this archive from 2008:
http://www.formilux.org/archives/haproxy/0801/0507.html
But the problem is that I can not recompile the kernel :(
Isn't there any other way like the x-forward-for header to make this work?
As this runs on layer 4 headers can not be inserted
I read this archive from 2008:
http://www.formilux.org/archives/haproxy/0801/0507.html
But the problem is that I can not recompile the kernel :(
Isn't there any other way like the x-forward-for header to make this work?
Kind regards,
Michiel
On 4/22/10 5:55 PM, Michiel van Es wrote:
Hi,
I
14 matches
Mail list logo
