Revision: 11070
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11070view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-05-18 06:26:56 + (Mon, 18 May 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-05-18 08:25 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
* utils/hbmk2/hbmk2.prg
Revision: 11071
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11071view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-05-18 06:39:14 + (Mon, 18 May 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-05-18 08:38 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
* utils/hbmk2/hbmk2.prg
snaipe...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
* harbour/contrib/rddsql/Makefile
+ implemented ODBC driver for RDDSQL
Thank you for these major contributions.
Out of interest, and in your opinion, does using ODBC instead of native
libraries make a big performance difference?
Regards
Alex
Revision: 11072
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11072view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-05-18 07:58:12 + (Mon, 18 May 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-05-18 09:57 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
*
On Fri, 15 May 2009, vszak...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Hi,
2009-05-15 09:21 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
* include/hbextern.ch
* source/rtl/Makefile
+ source/rtl/lang.c
+ Added HB_USERLANG() function to retrieve ietf code of
language set by user. Works
On Thu, 14 May 2009, Szak�ts Viktor wrote:
Hi,
2009-05-14 19:20 UTC+0200 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)
* harbour/bin/hb-func.sh
* respect HB_USER_LIBS creating hbmk.cfg
Is this for sure what you intented? I'm asking because
this way someone building Harbour while having
Hi Przemek,
2009-05-15 09:21 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
* include/hbextern.ch
* source/rtl/Makefile
+ source/rtl/lang.c
+ Added HB_USERLANG() function to retrieve ietf code of
language set by user. Works also on Windows.
In this code and also in other places you
an internal distro with some extra bundled libs.
HB_USER_LIBS is used as default library list by hb* scripts.
I wanted to use the same name. We can change of course but it
should be synced with envvar name used by hb* scripts.
To have the same end-result without such side-effect,
maybe
Revision: 11074
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11074view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-05-18 09:20:34 + (Mon, 18 May 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-05-18 11:19 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
* bin/hb-func.sh
!
Revision: 11075
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11075view=rev
Author: druzus
Date: 2009-05-18 09:24:44 + (Mon, 18 May 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-05-18 11:33 UTC+0200 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)
*
On Mon, 18 May 2009, vszak...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Hi,
2009-05-18 11:19 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
* bin/hb-func.sh
! HB_USER_LIBS_DEF - CC_HB_USER_LIBS
; QUESTION: Is it a problem to move these to HB_ namespace?
* source/rtl/lang.c
! Fixed to
Hi all
I was looking at letodb and there was some use of the the $ operator to search
in arrays. However, this would crash in Harbour.
Is there any good *technical* reason not to implement this in Harbour? It's use
with arrays certainly feels intuitive.
Thanks
Alex
Anyone else getting this after responding to the confirmation email?
Error
Could not find nomination with that confirmation hash, or nominations
are already confirmed.
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
Hi,
Alex Strickland wrote:
* harbour/contrib/rddsql/Makefile
+ implemented ODBC driver for RDDSQL
Thank you for these major contributions.
Out of interest, and in your opinion, does using ODBC instead of native
libraries make a big performance difference?
The only ODBC application
The native interface is much faster than ODBC and ADO, because they
usually represent a layer on the native DLL if I remember well. So
here in the company we use whenever possible direct access to the
native DLL.
Regards,
Vailton Renato
___
Harbour
Hello all,
This error, still persists:
[ERROR]
Error description: Error BASE/3012 Argument error: NEW
Args:
[ 1] = N 1470288
Stack Calls
===
Called from: = HB_OLEAUTO:NEW(0)
Called from: classes\ACTIVEX.PRG = TACTIVEX:NEW(0)
Called from: webexp.prg = MAIN(10)
Hello Pritpul,
I've put my hands a to change gtwvg to be compatible with OLE
implementation, but I'm unable to test changes. Does anyone have gtwvg
sample with working (or GPFing) ActiveX controls. I've tried to use
contrib/gtwvg/tests samples. They do not give any error, but demowvg
window
Hi All,
I used .hbp for library parameter files in hbmk2, but this is not very
clear for most ppl, as they think it's a project file (not suprisingly).
Now, I'm thinking how to make this more intuitive, and one solution
could be to use .hbl for library parameter files (as Harbour Library),
and
Hi,
1. I notice this error when i run prg with hbrun :
$ ./td.prg ( or$ hbrun td.prg )
Error BASE/6101 Unknown or unregistered symbol: HB_GT_CGI_DEFAULT (Quit)
Error BASE/6101 Unknown or unregistered symbol: HB_GT_CGI_DEFAULT
Called from HB_HRBRUN(0)
( I know that i can
Revision: 11076
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11076view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-05-18 14:08:27 + (Mon, 18 May 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-05-18 15:59 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
* utils/hbmk2/hbmk2.prg
Viktor Szakáts wrote:
The problem is we already use .hbl for compiled language files, so
I cannot make above change.
How about .hblib? No requirements that extensions be 3 chars, it's more just a
habit.
Regards
Alex
___
Harbour mailing list
The problem is we already use .hbl for compiled language files, so
I cannot make above change.
How about .hblib? No requirements that extensions be 3 chars, it's
more just a habit.
Not just a habit, Harbour (and of course hbmk2) also supports
DOS, and potentially other such limited
Revision: 11077
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11077view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-05-18 15:51:53 + (Mon, 18 May 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-05-18 17:51 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
* utils/hbmk2/hbmk2.prg
*
Revision: 11078
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11078view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-05-18 15:54:39 + (Mon, 18 May 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-05-18 17:54 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
* utils/hbmk2/hbmk2.prg
Revision: 11079
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11079view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-05-18 16:08:14 + (Mon, 18 May 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-05-18 18:03 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
* utils/hbmk2/hbmk2.prg
Mindaugas Kavaliauskas wrote:
The only ODBC application I've ever tried to write in my life is
contrib/rddsql/sddodbc/tests/test1.prg, so, I have no idea that the
answer is. I would expect to be it a little slower on client part (I
mean result set manipulation).
I found some quite old
Revision: 11080
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11080view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-05-18 17:47:43 + (Mon, 18 May 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-05-18 19:46 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
* utils/hbmk2/hbmk2.prg
On Mon, 18 May 2009, Szak�ts Viktor wrote:
Hi,
The problem is we already use .hbl for compiled language files, so
I cannot make above change.
These are my questions:
- Is there any better idea how to cleanup these file extensions?
- The standard extension for compiled .po language files is
.mo are gettext compatible compiled .po files. I plan to add support
for native gettext usage and in such case it will use .mo files by
gettext API resepcting domain names and .mo file localization (it's
strictly defined), etc.
[snip]
In summary.
I'll add support for .mo files as
Hi,
Pritpal Bedi wrote:
Mindaugas Kavaliauskas wrote:
The middle part of mail window is not redrawn, but I get no error.
It means ActiveX is not initialized even.
I will apply your changes and will do some tests todays.
Till then...
wvgax.prg wvgsink.c if full of commented out code,
Revision: 11081
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11081view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-05-18 19:37:06 + (Mon, 18 May 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-05-18 21:36 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
* utils/hbmk2/hbmk2.prg
Hi,
I've tried to add ActiveX to my plain WinAPI Hello world sample. I
needed to add *TWO* lines (marked by /* !!!*/) below and #pragma
begindump/enddump. THAT'S ALL! I understand that event handler is
missing and OleAutomation object should be created, but this is not so
much code. I have
Hi Mindaugas, Pritpal,
I was just writing about and Mindaugas sent this mail, great!
I was thinking about adding a separate handling for ActiveX code to
leave isolate as Ole code we already have, so it will be enough (!) to
add an upper layer where ActiveX can attach itself without needs of
Revision: 11082
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11082view=rev
Author: vouchcac
Date: 2009-05-18 21:28:54 + (Mon, 18 May 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-05-18 14:26 UTC-0800 Pritpal Bedi (prit...@vouchcac.com)
*
Hi Mindaugus
Mindaugas Kavaliauskas wrote:
I've tried to add ActiveX to my plain WinAPI Hello world sample. I
needed to add *TWO* lines (marked by /* !!!*/) below and #pragma
begindump/enddump. THAT'S ALL! I understand that event handler is
missing and OleAutomation object should be
Hi Mindaugas,
Il 18/05/2009 23.13, Mindaugas Kavaliauskas ha scritto:
Hi Francesco,
in the past I've wrote some code to include Internet Explorer window
into my dialogs as a separate control. Using some sample on the
internet I've implemented: IOleInPlaceFrame, IOleClientSite,
Francesco Saverio Giudice wrote:
Are these two different things the same ActiveX?
I will look at Pritpal's upload, but, as I wrote before, I would like to
have an independent (from gtwvg) version.
I've extended my previous sample by:
Hi Pritpal,
Not is another issue is the same except that now, with the patch, not repeated
infinitely and my old application will work.
The logic of call control function is different to Clipper. Could to say
something Maurilio?
I'm more worried about leaving the application.
Xavi
Pritpal Bedi wrote:
Hi Mindaugus
Hi Pritpal,
my name is Mindaugas. I've tried to joke a few times writing Pritpul,
but it seems you are not enough sharp-eyed to notice the difference
neither in spelling of my name nor in yours.
Regards,
Mindaugas
Hello Mindaugus
Mindaugas Kavaliauskas wrote:
I've extended my previous sample by:
nAddr := MakeWndProc( {|X,Y,Z,T| WndProc( X,Y,Z,T ) } )
Can you make this function public. Probably this may pave the
way to clean a non-portable part of GTWVG, whio knows.
Just to put everything
Sorry Mindaugas
Mindaugas Kavaliauskas wrote:
my name is Mindaugas. I've tried to joke a few times writing Pritpul,
but it seems you are not enough sharp-eyed to notice the difference
neither in spelling of my name nor in yours.
I did notice. At times a foreign name tends to have
Hi Mindaugas,
I'd certainly welcome your lightweight AX implementation,
this way hopefully not every contrib would need to reinvent
it again and again.
As for lightweight winapi, HBWHAT had a lot of problems, so
it's no more. Some WINAPI's are now implemented
(hopefully properly) as WAPI_*()
Hello
Viktor Szakáts wrote:
As for lightweight winapi, HBWHAT had a lot of problems, so
it's no more. Some WINAPI's are now implemented
(hopefully properly) as WAPI_*() functions in HBWIN. But
this effort seem to have stalled.
Not exactly.
The development in this direction got stalled
The development in this direction got stalled due to attention
to QT implementation. At a given point of time one may have
limited times.
HBWHAT was not bad either. It needs just few tweaks and by far
the most comprehensive API so far. Perhaps we need more resources
to join the effort.
It
Revision: 11083
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11083view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-05-19 05:21:24 + (Tue, 19 May 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-05-19 07:20 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
* contrib/hbwin/win_reg.prg
Revision: 11084
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=11084view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2009-05-19 05:39:40 + (Tue, 19 May 2009)
Log Message:
---
2009-05-19 07:31 UTC+0200 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)
*
46 matches
Mail list logo
