[Harbour] Moving externally dependent GTs

2008-08-22 Thread Szakáts Viktor
Hi all, I've noticed so far I've never ever compiled or dealt with 'gtalleg', simply because it fall out of the mainstream build infrastructure pbly because of it's external dependency. Since we now have a pretty good infrastructure in the contrib area, to detect and deal with 3rd party lib requ

RE: [Harbour] Moving externally dependent GTs

2008-08-22 Thread J. Lefebvre
No problem for me. -Message d'origine- De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Szakáts Viktor Envoyé : vendredi 22 août 2008 13:53 À : Harbour Project Main Developer List. Objet : [Harbour] Moving externally dependent GTs Hi all, I've noticed so far

Re: [Harbour] Moving externally dependent GTs

2008-08-23 Thread Lorenzo Fiorini
On 8/22/08, Szakáts Viktor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > These GTs would be involved in this move: > - gtalleg > - gtcrs > - gtsln > - gtxwc I agree for gtalleg. I strongly disagree for gtcrs, gtsln, gtxwc. In *nix ncurses, slang and X11 are as standard as gtwin or gtwvt are in Win. best regards

Re: [Harbour] Moving externally dependent GTs

2008-08-24 Thread Szakáts Viktor
Hi Lorenzo, Okay and I agree (having given it some more thought since). [ I'm not moving it until everyone comes back from holidays. ] Brgds, Viktor On 2008.08.24., at 8:49, Lorenzo Fiorini wrote: On 8/22/08, Szakáts Viktor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: These GTs would be involved in this mov