Viktor Szakáts wrote:
It probably works, but indeed looks a bit strange and not
very consistent with other code, so I think the answer is yes.
Before I make this change I believe I will alter the tool to find these
and report them, there are going to be many of them.
I'll post this list to t
;
> *De :* harbour-boun...@harbour-project.org [mailto:
> harbour-boun...@harbour-project.org] *De la part de* Viktor Szakáts
> *Envoyé :* vendredi 19 juin 2009 10:42
> *À :* Harbour Project Main Developer List.
> *Objet :* Re: [Harbour] within contrib\xhb\hblog.prg, "method&q
: harbour-boun...@harbour-project.org
[mailto:harbour-boun...@harbour-project.org] De la part de Viktor Szakáts
Envoyé : vendredi 19 juin 2009 10:42
À : Harbour Project Main Developer List.
Objet : Re: [Harbour] within contrib\xhb\hblog.prg, "method" vs "procedure"?
Hi JF,
On Fri
Hi JF,
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 10:33 AM, J. Lefebvre wrote:
> Hi Viktor
>
>
>
> In changelog I just see ;
>
>
>
> ! Deleted "bugtraq:append" (not mentioned in ChangeLog)
>
> property added to main Harbour trunk in:
>
> 2009-06-18 21:18 UTC+0200
>
> JF, pls fix this in you
Hi Viktor
In changelog I just see ;
! Deleted "bugtraq:append" (not mentioned in ChangeLog)
property added to main Harbour trunk in:
2009-06-18 21:18 UTC+0200
JF, pls fix this in your SVN client, otherwise next time
it will just reappear. Majority of these extensions
Hi April,
It probably works, but indeed looks a bit strange and not very consistent
with other code, so I think the answer is yes.
Brgds,
Viktor
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 2:48 AM, April White wrote:
> With in contrib\xhb\hblog.prg the class methods are identified as
> 'procedure'.
>
> Should they
With in contrib\xhb\hblog.prg the class methods are identified as
'procedure'.
Should they be changed to 'method' and return SELF?
April
--
Saw it ... wanted it ... had a fit ... got it!
___
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://li
