-Original Message-
From: Luis R. Stach [mailto:luisrst...@yahoo.com.ar]
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2010 11:04 PM
To: harbour@harbour-project.org
Subject: [Harbour] Error in SDDFB
English by Google
Hi
I'm trying to connect to Firebird but I can not, I get this error:
Error SDDFB/1903 Pre
Hello Luis,
I can only confirm your bug raport
(the same error here).
IMHO sddfb is still buggy oposite to
sddoci which work just fine.
sddfb can only make connection
(I can see it on Flamerobin fb tool) and nothing more ;-(
... but maybe is someone on our list, who can
say - it work ??
Mindau
Hi,
Luis R. Stach wrote:
Error SDDFB/1903 Prepare statement failed: SELECT * FROM agenda (DOS Error
335544569)
What I do is this:
ANNOUNCE RDDSYS
REQUEST SQLMIX, SDDFB
RDDSETDEFAULT( "SQLMIX" )
hConn := RDDINFO( RDDI_CONNECT, { "FIREBIRD",, "SYSDBA", "masterkey",
"192.168.0.1:d:\data\agenda
Hello Mindaugas,
Monday, March 15, 2010, 4:42:06 PM, you wrote:
MK> Hi,
MK> Luis R. Stach wrote:
>> Error SDDFB/1903 Prepare statement failed: SELECT * FROM agenda (DOS Error
>> 335544569)
>> What I do is this:
>>
>> ANNOUNCE RDDSYS
>> REQUEST SQLMIX, SDDFB
>> RDDSETDEFAULT( "SQLMIX" )
>>
>> h
Hello Mindaugas
What dou you think of integrate a ORM mapper to allow programm written
using sqlmix to be indipendent from sql string
2010/3/15 Mindaugas Kavaliauskas :
> Hi,
>
>
> Luis R. Stach wrote:
>>
>> Error SDDFB/1903 Prepare statement failed: SELECT * FROM agenda (DOS Error
>> 335544569)
Jacek Kubica wrote:
Any chance for it on this weekend ??
Almost finished. Compiles without error, but have not tested any SQL
backed yet.
Regards,
Mindaugas
___
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://
Massimo Belgrano wrote:
Hello Mindaugas
What dou you think of integrate a ORM mapper to allow programm written
using sqlmix to be indipendent from sql string
Hi,
I suggest you to write down your idea in C or PRG code and share it on
mailing list.
Regards,
Mindaugas
___
New generation languages (Python, Ruby etc. and even Java) have shifted focus to
using ORMs rather than SQL directly. Now instead of explicit SQL
statements, ActiveRecord (Ruby's Object Relational Mapper) uses
something like
emp=Employee.new
emp.name = "Emp1"
emp.basic = 4500
emp.designation = "Pr
> New generation languages (Python, Ruby etc. and even Java) have shifted focus
> to
> using ORMs rather than SQL directly. Now instead of explicit SQL
> statements, ActiveRecord (Ruby's Object Relational Mapper) uses
> something like
>
> emp=Employee.new
> emp.name = "Emp1"
> emp.basic = 4500
>
ts"
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2010 10:02 PM
To: "Harbour Project Main Developer List."
Subject: Re: [Harbour] Error in SDDFB
New generation languages (Python, Ruby etc. and even Java) have shifted
focus to
using ORMs rather than SQL directly. Now instead of explicit SQL
statements, A
>> So for me it's hard to understand why to reinvent
>> it, if we already have it by the name "RDD".
>>
>> If we want to go beyond this and implement the whole
>> "ORM" buzzword, it's a whole separate project,
>> not just some extra lines of code in sqlmix.
>
> ORM is defined as Object Relational
Viktor Szakáts wrote:
So, if that's all "ORM" means, we already have
it, and that was one of the features that made
dBase so popular versus other "database" languages.
My understanding is that there is a "disconnect" between the programmers object
based view of the data and the DBMS's relatio
12 matches
Mail list logo
