[Hardhats-members] More OS Licensing News with GPL3 links and more

2004-12-07 Thread Nancy E. Anthracite
News: Sun Proposes New Open-Source License Sun could use the Common Development and Distribution License for an open-source Solaris, but Linus Torvalds and others doubt that the license will help Sun create an open-source community. http://ct.enews.eweek.com/rd/cts?d=186-1392-8-85-54068-154224-0-0

Re: [Hardhats-members] FileMan for GT.M

2004-12-07 Thread Richard G. DAVIS
As Strother Martin might say, "...what we have here is a failure to encapsulate!" Even so, the early DHCP design used a high level of abstraction to create a form of "directory tree". Some of the benefits of the name space approach for naming routines are: 1. The method is implementati

Re: [Hardhats-members] FileMan for GT.M

2004-12-07 Thread John Leo Zimmer
-- Original Message --- From: "Tyrus Maynard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 10:39:05 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] FileMan for GT.M ... > Where is there posted the comprehensive listing of the routines > that is sorted according to

Re: [Hardhats-members] FileMan for GT.M

2004-12-07 Thread Tyrus Maynard
The further discussion on this thread helps me see that GTM harbors the tools for "selective use" rather than seeking an "extraction" to run on a totally separate Fileman installation (especially Bhaskar's examples). So, whether it be Fileman, or Fileman+, or the Diamond (which Fil is "cutting"

Re: [Hardhats-members] FileMan for GT.M

2004-12-07 Thread Wolfgang Giere
Bhaskar A wonderful explanation, congratulation! Excuse me that I misspelled your name. Wolfgang Giere "K.S. Bhaskar" wrote: > Fil is correct. The GT.M ability to configure development environments > is exceptionally flexible. Read and digest the following when you have > a few minutes to ab

Re: [Hardhats-members] FileMan for GT.M

2004-12-07 Thread Wolfgang Giere
Hi Rusty, what about the following strategy: You extract (now I am in the extraction camp) all DI* routines and run DINIT. I guess it will ask for the missing routines. I remember vaguely that in earlier days some %-Routines had to be edited by hand, had to do with dates and our other date-format