What is ED^MAGUSIT ? I ran it at the GTM prompt:
GTMD0 ED^MAGUSIT
%GTM-E-INVCMD, Invalid command keyword encountered
D0 ED^MAGUSIT
^-
Anna
- Original Message -
From: Nancy Anthracite [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Friday, July 08,
We have been trying to Issue/Release the Drugs Prescribed to the Patient,
but can't get through and the message No Refill(s) to be Released; No
Partial(s) to be Released is what we get to see. How can we release a
prescribed drug? (the drug to be released has available stock to release.)
Using
Your command looks like the O in DO is a ZERO.
It is the routine that gets run with that parameter, so it looks like that
routine, and undoubtedly others is missing. I will see if I can find the
patch that included it when I get a chance.
On Friday 08 July 2005 02:06 am, Anna Joseph wrote:
Just a guess here, but if you just prescribed the drug, maybe RL means
releasing a refill and you are not releasing a refill, you are releasing the
original order??? So maybe you want the default next screen?
On Friday 08 July 2005 03:50 am, Anna Joseph wrote:
We have been trying to
This is the header for the file in the VA Demo and I don't see a patch number,
so I need a guru (please) to tell me how to search to see what patch this
came from because I do not know how to figure that out.
MAGUSIT ;WOIFO/SRR/RMP - IMAGE SITE PARAMETERS COMPANION [ 06/29/2001 18:28 ]
Check out these documents in the vdl for DRG Grouper:
http://www.va.gov/vdl/Financial_Admin.asp?appID=36
- Original Message -
From: Kirk Abbott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Kirk Abbott [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 12:40 AM
Subject:
Having a working VistA installation using Caché under Windows 2003 Server,
I'm now working on a GTM (v5.0) installation under Linux Enterprise Server.
According to Bhaskar's instructions, I first tried to install Xdialog, which
needs gtk+-1.2 installed. I have gtk installed (both 1.2 and 2.4) but
I think that XDialog is just a fancy way to get an answer to a question and if
you hunt around on the WorldVistA wiki, I think that JohnLeo Zimmer said he
posted a way of doing the installation it without using XDialog. Perhaps you
can look at that or figure out from the script how to get
Thank you Nancy, I'll search the wiki and try to find an answer. Thanks for
your offer of writing a script for me. I'll try to solve it myself in the
next hours and I'll let you know if I couldn't before you get to work on the
script.
Alberto
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have that routine with the same two first lines in a test installation of the
VA Demo
OpenVista with no additional patches installed and the routine is included in
an older
OpenVistA but the second line indicates an older version;
;;2.5;IMAGING;**1**;June 29, 2001
Anna's error in typing the
OK, here is what is in the VA Demo:
OUTPUT FROM WHAT FILE: OPTION// INSTALL(5894 entries)
Select INSTALL NAME: MAG
1 MAG 2.5T11 Install Completed 10/16/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:41:41
= VistA Imaging v2.5t11L ;Created on Oct 16, [EMAIL PROTECTED]:51:14
2 MAG*3.0*1
Alberto,
You can find a script here that uses plain ncurses dialog - just scroll
down to the Script tweaks from Zimmer
http://openforum.worldvista.org/~forum/index.php?title=Installation_How_To_VistA_GT.M_Linux
If you need to you should find lots of areas to get the development RPM
package
You're right. Those 14 lines or so are absurd on several levels. One, it's
contradictory with the nature of copyrighting software generated by federal
employees (or contract employees). Two, while Imaging is considered a
medical device by the FDA, what is regulated is its use, not the copying
It's not quite so absurd, though, when you consider that MUMPS is
traditionally interpreted, and if you change the code on the system
where it is intended to run, then you are effectively modifying the
executable. It's not just a matter of making a copy of the source
code and saying Don't
14 matches
Mail list logo
