Functional programming is a fine idea that has been around for a long
time. Church's lambda calculus predates electronic digital computers,
and LISP dates back to circa 1960. It is attractive because it
theoretically lends itself better to more formal proofs of correctness
(my own gut tells me th
Thanks for the link. I just went through it. It only took me a few
hours to digest it.
I still don't think I could write a full appliation in it so far.
Kevin
On 12/3/05, Todd Berman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-12-03 at 14:16 -0800, Gregory Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Dec 3, 2005,
On Sat, 2005-12-03 at 14:16 -0800, Gregory Woodhouse wrote:
> On Dec 3, 2005, at 1:54 PM, Kevin Toppenberg wrote:
>
> > Don't forget to make this language understandable. If this new
> > language looks at all like the code you have been showing me, then I
> > will have HUGE learning curve. And y
On Dec 3, 2005, at 1:54 PM, Kevin Toppenberg wrote:
Don't forget to make this language understandable. If this new
language looks at all like the code you have been showing me, then I
will have HUGE learning curve. And you might estrange potential
users.
Kevin
Trust me, I am most assuredly
Don't forget to make this language understandable. If this new
language looks at all like the code you have been showing me, then I
will have HUGE learning curve. And you might estrange potential
users.
Kevin
On 12/3/05, Gregory Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Dec 2, 2005, at 5:42
On Dec 2, 2005, at 5:42 PM, Kevin Toppenberg wrote:
I think it is excellent, but it doesn't address my need to have a
medical record system for my office. VistA does, so I am working with
it.
I can certainly appreciate not having the time to work on something
like this. I suppose my hope w
