On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 08:43 -0500, smcphelan wrote:
You are correct. I forgot that with GT.M you have to really start
from
scratch and cannot assume you have anything.
I will probably try to set up a functional GT.M on Linux at Juno
Beach. Are
you up for helping?
[KSB] Steve, with an
It's the same Steve but you would need routine ^ZOSVGUX.. --At this point
no VistA routines have been extracted. As I said, There are many ways to
do this.
Lloyd
- Original Message -
From: smcphelan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Sunday, August
You will have to rename ZOSVGUX to %ZOSV and then you will be able to run
ZTMGRSET. However, watch carefully when it runs as there may be some missing
routines. Make a log of the installation so you can read back through the
text generated.
On Monday 29 August 2005 07:11 am, Lloyd Milligan
I did not find this to be necessary. After extracting the routines
^ZTMGRSET runs without renaming anything. Possibly something has changed in
the August distribution to make this work?
Lloyd
- Original Message -
From: Nancy Anthracite [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
You are correct. I forgot that with GT.M you have to really start from
scratch and cannot assume you have anything.
I will probably try to set up a functional GT.M on Linux at Juno Beach. Are
you up for helping?
- Original Message -
From: Lloyd Milligan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
I do not always have this problem, but sometimes it happens with some
conversions of Cache.dat files to GTM use. It apparently has it has to do
with a chicken and egg problem with the global ^ZOSF and this routine. This
is a way around the problem if it happens.
On Monday 29 August 2005
On 8/27/05, Nancy Anthracite [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--
Nancy Anthracite
Is there a formal procedure for porting the Cache.dat into something
that GT.M handles? Or don't I have the concepts right?
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the
On 8/28/05, Mike Lieman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a formal procedure for porting the Cache.dat into something
that GT.M handles? Or don't I have the concepts right?
I don't, do I?
Are CACHE.zip and VistA-GTM-UNIX-ZTMGRSET-ready.zip equivalent?
The Cache.dat is the full set of routines and globals to be used in Cache and
usually works fine if you follow the instructions on Hardhats, although those
instructions often get updated as new FOIA releases have new wrinkles to iron
out.
The process of porting this to GTM is not seamless, and
I just realized that we don't want ANY of the percent routines anyway, so
pretend I didn't say that! They need to be made out of the Z routines that
are appropriate for the code - i.e., Cache, GTM, etc.
On Sunday 28 August 2005 10:55 am, Nancy Anthracite wrote:
The Cache.dat is the full set
If you pull down the VistA-GTM-UNIX*.zip now, it should be. Cameron just
made it available.
- Original Message -
From: Mike Lieman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2005 5:37 AM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] There is a new FOIA
I never export the %Z* routines as the %Z* routines are saved from the
appropriate Z* routines for the given OS selected when ZTMGRSET is first
run. D ^ZTMGRSET and you will get all the necessary % stuff you need for
GT.M.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
The same routines and globals with the following differences in packaging:
The cache.zip contains a cache.dat that is ready to go after mapping the %
routines and globals properly. The GTM zip contains all the same globals
(in individual files) and routines in one file VistA.rtn, except the %Z*
Summarizing previous Hardhats posts.. Unzip the
VistA-GTM-UNIX-ZTMGRSET-ready.zip file to a scratch directory. Navigate to
that directory and use this (from Bhaskar, August 2004) -
for i in *.zwr ; do mupip load $i ; done
This assumes you've already created the database, etc. To load
On 8/28/05, Lloyd Milligan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Summarizing previous Hardhats posts..
Lloyd,
THANKS!
When I had posted my question this morning, it was with too little
sleep, and no caffeine. ( I know, I know, I *KNOW* better, but... /me
shrugs...) and I worried if it might be off
What does your perl command do that is different from:
S %DIRECTORY=appropriate value
D STRIPCR^ZOSVGUX(%DIRECTORY)
- Original Message -
From: Lloyd Milligan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2005 8:37 PM
Subject: Re:
dos2unix works like a charm and it is really easy to type!
On Sunday 28 August 2005 10:33 pm, smcphelan wrote:
What does your perl command do that is different from:
S %DIRECTORY=appropriate value
D STRIPCR^ZOSVGUX(%DIRECTORY)
- Original Message -
From: Lloyd Milligan
--
Nancy Anthracite
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects Teams * Testing QA
18 matches
Mail list logo
