Joe,
You can conference call with Skype too...I think it's up to 5
people...after that I recommend Teamspeak which would require setting up
a server. Molly and I have been using Skype to connect for over a
yearI have reduced my business phone bill to about $30/mth (am using
VOIP now too) ..
Dr. Cheah,
You have spawned an innovation at Crain Communications.
I asked my tech department head, Fred Bauman, (I cc'd him on our last
e-mail) about installing Skype and sent him the link, expecting to get a no and
some explaination about the firewall.
Instead, after a couple of hou
is
> Richardson
> Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2005 7:14 AM
> To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] WebServices future development???
>
> Jim;
>
>Perhaps we need to get you and Arden Forey together while we are in
> Seattle in May, so that
needed to
>> solve the problem are already in place.
>>
>> I'm just curious- I love architecture discussions.
>>
>> Thanks for indulging me,
>> Renee
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PRO
Greg W wrote:
>In fact, my inclination would be to not try to implement web services
>directly in MUMPS, but there still needs to be a mechanism for
>communicating with whatever you do use to implement web services. Using
>the TCP/IP as natively implemented in MUMPS isn't a very good solution.
You
s.
>
> Thanks for indulging me,
> Renee
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Greg
> Woodhouse
> Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 12:13 PM
> To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: RE: [Hardhats-m
ssage-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg
Woodhouse
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 12:13 PM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] WebServices future development???
In fact, my inclination would be to not try to implement web ser
In fact, my inclination would be to not try to implement web services
directly in MUMPS, but there still needs to be a mechanism for
communicating with whatever you do use to implement web services. Using
the TCP/IP as natively implemented in MUMPS isn't a very good solution.
I would much prefer to
ECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 11:26 AM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] WebServices future development???
Web service was basically introduced as a standard to replace CORBA.
There's a lot more to it than
Web service was basically introduced as a standard to replace CORBA.
There's a lot more to it than just being XML. It's a way to expose
procedures to 3rd parties without having to develop your own set of
protocols. You expose your service via a WSDL (web service descriptor
language) document.
> interfaces with something like CCR.
>
>CHCS used to handle interfaces like this all the time. The CHCS
> interface and mapping to the new interface was usually done before the other
> interface could be debugged.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -
> From:
Yes, and I use it quite a bit.
--- GARY MONGER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pretty sure an XML parser was released last year for VistA.
>
A practical man is a man who practices the errors of his forefathers.
--Benjamin Disraeli
Greg Woodhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
s
Richardson
Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2005 7:14 AM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] WebServices future development???
Jim;
Perhaps we need to get you and Arden Forey together while we are in
Seattle in May, so that we can speck out what is needed fo
Pretty sure an XML parser was released last year for VistA.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Self
Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2005 2:38 AM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] WebServices future
-
From: "Jim Self" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2005 1:40 AM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] WebServices future development???
Nancy wrote:
Not only Greg is interested in the CCR. There are some of us involved to
varying degrees with the ASTM for just that reason and
usually done before the other
interface could be debugged.
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Self" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2005 1:40 AM
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] WebServices future development???
> Nancy wrote:
> >Not only Greg is inte
Not visible, which is why I joined the committee so I could find out what was
going on.
On Sunday 01 May 2005 04:40 am, Jim Self wrote:
> Nancy wrote:
> >Not only Greg is interested in the CCR. There are some of us involved to
> >varying degrees with the ASTM for just that reason and Arden Forre
Nancy wrote:
>Not only Greg is interested in the CCR. There are some of us involved to
>varying degrees with the ASTM for just that reason and Arden Forrey and
>others are mapping VistA and other standards to the CCR.
Is this work at all visible through OpenVistA? If there is a mapping from VistA
Gregory Woodhouse wrote:
>Oh, I quite agree that this would be a worth project. In fact, I have
>been exploring a Java/MySQL implementation, but unfortunately, it has
>been temporarily sidetracked by my ever growing "to do" list.
>
>I do not mean to sound like a broken record here, but I am much le
Gregory Woodhouse wrote:
>I've never worked with M2Web, so maybe I'm mistaken here, but I thought
>its primary function was to generate XML documents from Fileman and
>make it available via HTTP (not a small accomplishment). Am I mistaken?
Not mistaken in that generating and serving XML documents
I've never worked with M2Web, so maybe I'm mistaken here, but I thought
its primary function was to generate XML documents from Fileman and
make it available via HTTP (not a small accomplishment). Am I mistaken?
Implementing CCR would also require the reverse: receiving XML
documents and sa
n Behalf Of Jim
Self
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2005 9:26 PM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] WebServices future development???
I think you define web services too narrowly by confining them to a
single document
format. It seems to me that that ignores most of
I think you define web services too narrowly by confining them to a single
document
format. It seems to me that that ignores most of the capabilities of web
servers and of
their most ubiquitous and generally capable clients. I do see great potential
value in
providing application oriented servic
That looks interesting. There isn't much documentation available at
that site, but you could take a look at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/jboss
for more information on JBoss, the core of the product.
To tell you the truth, I don't quite understand how regulatory issues
figure into the picture
How about using jengine - http://www.jengine.org/?
Currently under development, JEngine is an Open Source,
standards-compliant, enterprise integration engine implemented in
Java. The server framework, based on Java 2 Platform Enterprise
Edition (J2EE), provides a robust standard for deploying a
Not only Greg is interested in the CCR. There are some of us involved to
varying degrees with the ASTM for just that reason and Arden Forrey and
others are mapping VistA and other standards to the CCR. So, we do not
disagree with you and since the VA has representatives on many standards
comm
Oh, I quite agree that this would be a worth project. In fact, I have been exploring a Java/MySQL implementation, but unfortunately, it has been temporarily sidetracked by my ever growing "to do" list.
I do not mean to sound like a broken record here, but I am much less sanguine about the possibil
Web services allow different applications from different sources to communicate with each other without time-consuming custom coding, and because all communication is in XML, Web services are not tied to any one operating system or programming language. For example,
Java can talk with Perl, Window
list repository (Do you have a name?) wrote:
>Is Pacific Telehealth & Technology Hui the only 3rd party vendor
>currently developing a WebServices interface for VistA?
What are they doing? Is it something not covered by M2Web?
I haven't heard anything about it here.
I am interested in anything rel
Who is list repository?
On Friday 29 April 2005 07:22 pm, list repository wrote:
> Is Pacific Telehealth & Technology Hui the only 3rd party vendor
> currently developing a WebServices interface for VistA?
>
>
> ---
> This SF.Net email is spons
Is Pacific Telehealth & Technology Hui the only 3rd party vendor
currently developing a WebServices interface for VistA?
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games.
Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great ev
31 matches
Mail list logo
