On Mar 23, 2006, at 7:59 PM, Joseph Dal Molin wrote:
perhaps we should have an introduce yourself week?
I disagree with the idea that people need to feel pressured into
announcing their presence or into saying more than the feel
comfortable doing. That's fine for informal discussion
Have you considered other alternatives?
Since most abusers probably run bots to do their bidding, why not try using
is a person there test such as the popular type the code that appears in
the graphic below.
---
This SF.Net email is
I agree that I do not feel we should throw up any potential barriers for folks
who are just kicking the tires.
If we do offer a way to introduce oneself if desired, we probably need to
think about it carefully. If we don't, we might end up providing a spot for
a few elaborate advertisements
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 08:56, Dan wrote:
Have you considered other alternatives?
Since most abusers probably run bots to do their bidding, why not try using
is a person there test such as the popular type the code that appears in
the graphic below.
Thats a PIA to code up.
Ruben
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 08:52, Joseph Dal Molin wrote:
Greg,
No pressure intended at allthe wording and intent of my suggestion
was that it be purely voluntary.
I think it is about time we ***all*** found out who this Greg Woodhouse
person is.
I mean really... who has the name of Wood
On mailing lists that I administer, unless I recognize the e-mail
address, I always write asking the respondent to confirm that they are a
real human being and not a 'bot. Someday, there will be an AI 'bot that
will defeat my procedure, but it seems to have worked so far.
-- Bhaskar
Dan
Wasn't any big deal when I coded one in Java/JSP.
Any popular Wiki software should probably have it as a built in option or
there's probably a 3rd party plugin.
At 09:29 AM 3/24/2006, Ruben wrote:
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 08:56, Dan wrote:
Have you considered other alternatives?
Since most
Vote read free/ managed manipulate
thurman
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Call for Discussion: GatedAccess vs
GatedWriteable Wiki Policy
I vote for AnonymousReadOnly/GatedWriteable
That is my preference.
The issue of know who your neighbours are is an important one when
considering how to maximize collaboration etc. There are I believe
I vote for AnonymousReadOnly/GatedWriteable, but I wouldn't terribly
mind logging in to a GatedAccess system (However, I'm still waiting for
my user ID).
Mike Schrom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At the request of several people in our VistA Community,
I am asking for discussion of the issue of
David already knows that I am unequivocally for the
AnonymousReadOnly/GatedWriteable policy and strongly oppose the alternative.
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into
--- Nancy Anthracite [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David already knows that I am unequivocally for the
AnonymousReadOnly/GatedWriteable policy and strongly oppose the
alternative.
What is the purpose of the Wiki? If it is documentation, then requiring
registration merely to read the content
On 3/23/06, Mike Schrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I vote for AnonymousReadOnly/GatedWriteable, but I wouldn't terribly
mind logging in to a GatedAccess system (However, I'm still waiting for
my user ID).
I am for this too, but the registration process might be an issue.
What will prevent
] Call for Discussion: GatedAccess vs
GatedWriteable Wiki Policy
On 3/23/06, Mike Schrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I vote for AnonymousReadOnly/GatedWriteable, but I wouldn't terribly
mind logging in to a GatedAccess system (However, I'm still waiting
for
my user ID).
I am for this too
, Inc
Surprise, Arizona 85374
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Toppenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 3:23 PM
To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] Call for Discussion: GatedAccess vs
GatedWriteable Wiki
I agree whole heartedly about thanking David for his wiki dedication and all
of the other things he does as well. He is pretty quiet about it, but he
does a heck of a lot of work!
On Thursday 23 March 2006 22:38, JohnLeoZ wrote:
I vote to let the whole world read... and hope they do.
On 3/23/06, Joseph Dal Molin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I vote for AnonymousReadOnly/GatedWriteable
perhaps we should have an
introduce yourself week?
Joseph
I would want this on the Wikki though, not email. Too easy to get
lost on email.
Kevin
Good idea!!
Kevin Toppenberg wrote:
On 3/23/06, Joseph Dal Molin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I vote for AnonymousReadOnly/GatedWriteable
perhaps we should have an
introduce yourself week?
Joseph
I would want this on the Wikki though, not email. Too easy to get
lost on email.
Kevin
18 matches
Mail list logo
