- Original Message -
From: Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 12:28 AM
Subject: Re: [hardware] [H] Anybody know what happed to Autopatcher
http://www.autopatcher.com/downloads
Usually I get the runaround when
http://www.autopatcher.com/downloads
Usually I get the runaround when trying to download
Autopatcher. If you have
the actual link for Autopatcher for XP, English FULL for
November, please
post it for us. When I click on the link within the above
link I get a bunch
of hypertext
At 06:08 AM 12/2/2006, you wrote:
-Usually I get the runaround when trying to download Autopatcher. If
you have the actual link for Autopatcher for XP, English FULL for
November, please post it for us. When I click on the link within the
above link I get a bunch of hypertext and no link to do
I just started cataloging all my wife's mp3 collection and it is
pretty brutal. There is a mix between stuff downloaded from iTunes,
ripped from CD via WMP, and just random mp3s. A lot don't have ID3
tags. Some without tags are sitting in the directory structure of
their artist/album, some
Any consensus yet out there in the real world?
They've been out for a few months now. :)
--
JRS[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please remove **X** to reply...
...Cleverly Disguised As A Responsible Adult...
I think the Gigabyte GA-P965-DQ6 takes top honors for now. I'm still waiting
on nvidia 680-based and ATI RD600-based boards...the GA-N680SLI-DQ6 looks to
be a very nice board that should be available late this month.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:hardware-
[EMAIL
Has reliability improved for the non-Intel chipsets these days? I still
remember when VIA, SiS, ATI, nVidia, and such used to cause us fits and
were to be avoided
I have a good ole Intel 865 in my current PC, no issues...
Are the newer ATI and nVidia chipsets looking like good solid
Usually I get the runaround when trying to download
Autopatcher. If you have
the actual link for Autopatcher for XP, English FULL for
November, please
post it for us. When I click on the link within the above
link I get a bunch
of hypertext and no link to do the download.
Here is a
Still a bit early to tell on the N680 and RD600, but initial indications for
the 680 look positive.
NVidia's chipsets have reached a point where they are pretty solid. I'd
still avoid anything Via...SiS is hit-and-miss, and I have no experience
with ATI.
The big problem with Intel's offerings is
I went with the 680i in my new box which CW built for me, he seemed very
impressed with it as well. Online reviews are very encouraging.
- Original Message -
From: Greg Sevart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'The Hardware List' hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006
The 680i boards are fantastic
Sent via BlackBerry from Cingular Wireless
-Original Message-
From: Veech [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 14:01:05
To:The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: Re: [H] Best Core2 Duo mobo?
I went with the 680i in my new box which CW
Yeah, I think the 680 is going to end up being the preferred enthusiast
chipset for C2D and C2Q...I'm just not satisfied with any of the offerings
available yet. :)
I'm pretty picky, though...I want 8+ SATA onboard, PATA, onboard DTS
Connect/DDL, etc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
From: Greg Sevart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: The Hardware List hardware@hardwaregroup.com
To: 'The Hardware List' hardware@hardwaregroup.com
Subject: RE: [H] Best Core2 Duo mobo?
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 14:33:09 -0600
The big problem with Intel's offerings is that only the 965 is really
More than 16 PCIe lanes, performance, overclocking headroom... (the rest are
really ICH8/R:) any PATA channels, Ethernet...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:hardware-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hayes Elkins
Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 4:28 PM
To:
You mean more than one x16 PCIe lane, right? That's the one edge a 975 board
has over a 965.
As far as the rest, that is simply not correct. Performance? It's the only
intel chipset that officially supports DDR2-800. Overclocking headroom?
That's completely based on the manufacturer's design,
What?
The 975 doesn't natively support ddr2-800, its southbridge is older and it gets
throttled by 965p boards in benchmabarks. Some boards, like the Asus p5b-e
offer crossfire support etc.
I can't think of any good reason to use 975 at this point
CW
Sent via BlackBerry from Cingular
You and Chris are misinterpreting what I wrote. I never once stated I was
comparing the 965 to the 975. I'm comparing the 965 (and ICH8/R) to the
competing 680i, RD600, AND to an enthusiast-grade chipset that Intel SHOULD
have that is native for C2D/C2Q. They simply don't have one; that's the
OK :)
Those are valid points. The more I play with the 680i, though, the more that
it's hard to argue with it being the definitive it board.
CW
-Original message-
From: Greg Sevart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2006 18:22:21 -0600
To: 'The Hardware List'
It's not perfect, but this site: http://musicbrainz.org/ has programs
that do exactly what you're talking about.
It takes random mp3 files, and fills in all their tags--does it off
of file size and some other factors, I think.
I've used iEatBrainz on mac a lot. It's found and fixed a lot
I don't need or want SLI though. and the cheapest i680 board at Newegg is a
whopping 250 bucks. ouch..
OK :)
Those are valid points. The more I play with the 680i, though, the more that
it's hard to argue with it being the definitive it board.
CW
--
JRS[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please
Hey, you asked for the best. Be prepared to shell. :) I still think that the
best 680i boards are yet to come...and who knows how good (or bad) DFI's
RD600 boards will be.
Greg
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:hardware-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JRS
Sent:
21 matches
Mail list logo
